OBAMA’S JUSTICE DEPARTMENT Announces HUGE Giveaway To Young Thugs For Housing And Jobs [VIDEO]

Loretta Lynch is responsible for this! She’s into coddling young thugs in the hopes that they won’t turn to a life of crime. Please listen to the video below where you’ll hear Loretta Lynch speak of how she thinks black youth is targeted and that they are the victims. Unreal!

Controlling the narrative is what the left likes to do because it makes the term politically correct and more acceptable. The left actually believes if they change the words people use to describe things, it also changes the thing itself. It doesn’t. Criminals are criminals no matter what you call them.
HERE’S YOUR JUSTICE DEPARTMENT-LORETTA LYNCH IS RIDICULOUS!
“THEY TAKE OUR BABIES AND THEY PUT THEM OUT OF SCHOOLS”
LYNCH SPEAKS ABOUT GOING INTO THE SCHOOLS AND CHANGING THE DISCIPLINE FOR MINORITIES VS WHITES – SHE’S THE ONE WHO DECIDED THE MINORITIES NEEDED TO HAVE LESS PUNISHMENT SIMPLY BECAUSE OF THE COLOR OF THEIR SKIN

SO NOW WE THROW MONEY AT THESE CRIMINALS:

The Justice Department announced a plan to throw $1.75 million at young criminals in hopes that they don’t become adult criminals. But you’d never know that given the linguistic fog the DOJ has conjured up.

A press release issued earlier this week describes a new $1.75 million grant program as designed “to help young people involved in the justice system find jobs and housing.”

Wait, you ask, if these young people are “involved” in the justice system, doesn’t that mean they already have jobs? Like, say, as a trainee in the dispatcher’s office, or a desk clerk in the attorney general’s office, or maybe a janitor at the local courthouse?

Not exactly. In this case, “justice-involved youth” is what we’re now supposed to call juvenile delinquents, also known as young criminals.

This is not a euphemism run amok as much as it is an exercise in obfuscation. After all, euphemisms at least try to convey the same meaning, just in a less harsh way, as the words they replace. Such as: “substandard housing” for slum, or “differently abled” for crippled. But being “involved” in something can mean anything. An arsonist could be described as a person who is “involved in the home building industry.” A drunk driver will likely end up “involved in traffic enforcement.”

To be fair, the administration didn’t, as some have claimed, coin the “justice-involved youth” term. It’s been tossed around academic circles for years. But this administration has embraced this sort of verbal legerdemain.

Read more: IBD


Join The Conversation: Leave a Comment