The California Jihadi bride was interviewed three times before getting approval for a visa but no one thought to look at her Facebook page. This cold-blooded terrorists was posting rants and comments about jihad and violence to her Facebook page. How hard is it to see that this future terrorist would be a candidate to turn down for any entry into the U.S.:

Tashfeen Malik, the Pakistani woman who killed 14 people with her husband in San Bernardino earlier this month, openly advocated violent jihad on her social media accounts before coming to the U.S., but government officials approved her fiancee visa anyway, The New York Times reports.

californiaterrorists

Law enforcement officials discovered the posts, according to The Times. Had authorities found the messages when Malik applied last year for a K-1 fiancee visa to come to the U.S. with her husband, Syed Farook, she likely would not have been approved for entry. But, as The Times notes, immigration officials rarely check applicants’ social media posts for red flags. And female applicants are generally subject to less scrutiny than male applicants.

 

How about this bombshell that you might have forgotten:   

9:11hijackers

MIAMI, Florida (CNN) — Six months to the day after Mohamed Atta and Marwan Al-Shehhi flew planes into the World Trade Center, the Immigration and Naturalization Service notified a Venice, Florida, flight school that the two men had been approved for student visas.

Rudi Dekkers of Huffman Aviation, where Atta, 33, and Al-Shehhi, 23, first trained in July 2000, showed the yellow INS forms to CNN during an interview Monday. Dekkers said he was surprised to get the forms at such a late date.

The INS had a different reaction.

“I think it is certainly embarrassing that the letters show up at this late date,” said INS spokesman Russ Bergeron. “It does serve to illustrate what we have been saying since 1995 — that the current system for collecting information and tracking foreign students is antiquated, outdated, inaccurate and untimely.”

Bergeron said the INS forms made it clear that actual approval of the visas took place before the September 11 attacks.

Former INS District Director Tom Fischer told CNN that “the letters should never have been sent.” Their delivery, he said, was “a case of the right hand not knowing what the left hand was doing.”

Six months after their deaths, two of the Sept. 11 hijackers are given student visas for U.S. flight school. CNN’s Mark Potter reports (March 12)

The M-1 student visa request forms for Atta and al-Shehhi were filed by Huffman Aviation on August 29, 2000.

The forms asked that the men, who had entered the United States on tourist visas, be allowed to change their visa status so they could take a $27,300 professional pilot program that would last from September 1, 2000, until September 1 the next year.

The student visa requests were actually granted months later — on July 17, 2001, for Atta, and August 9, 2001, for al-Shehhi — but postmarks indicate the letters of notification were only sent out to Huffman Aviation last week. They were received Monday, the six-month milestone of last year’s terror attacks.

The INS said it sent notification to the two men of their visa status change shortly after the requests were approved. Flight schools, Bergeron said, are routinely last to be notified.

The letters to Huffman Aviation were sent from the INS Student Processing Center run by ACS Inc. in London, Kentucky.

On October 25, 2001, the INS awarded ACS a contract to begin helping the federal agency “process the arrival and departure forms of foreign students, businessmen, and tourists visiting the United States,” according to an ACS news release from that time.

Leslie Poole, ACS’ vice president, said part of the company’s job involves helping the INS clear up its backlog. However, she said ACS only processed requests from the INS and played no role in screening any information.

Via: CNN

Via: iotw

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.