Remember Christopher Steele? He is the former British spy who prepared the Russia “ golden showers dossier” that led to this scam of an investigation that has lasted more than two years at a cost of over $25 million.

The investigation into President Donald Trump’s campaign is a nothingburger but has consumed the news and cast a shadow on the Trump presidency.

You won’t believe this but Christopher Steele just told a London court that he was hired to provide a basis to challenge the legitimacy of the 2016 presidential election in the event that Trump won. No, we’re just now hearing this when this guy could have said this two years ago!

We’ve reported many times about the curious case of the sudden resignation on the day after Trump’s inauguration of the British Intel leader (GCHQ) Robert Hannigan. See our report below then ask if it’s possible that our previous administration went around our intel agencies?  Was Hannigan, a promising leader, involved in something he had to resign over?


Trending: Students Stage Walkout in Support of 15-Year-Old Raped by “Boy in a Skirt” After Victim’s “Brave” Testimony Results in Charges [Video]

The Washington Times reported Monday (original links):

He said the law firm Perkins Coie wanted to be in a position to contest the results based on evidence he unearthed on the Trump campaign conspiring with Moscow on election interference.

His scenario is contained in a sealed Aug. 2 declaration in a defamation law suit brought by three Russian bankers in London. The trio’s American attorneys filed his answers Tuesday in a libel lawsuit in Washington against the investigative firm Fusion GPS, which handled the former British intelligence officer.

In an answer to interrogatories, Mr. Steele wrote: “Fusion’s immediate client was law firm Perkins Coie. It engaged Fusion to obtain information necessary for Perkins Coie LLP to provide legal advice on the potential impact of Russian involvement on the legal validity of the outcome of the 2016 US Presidential election.

“Based on that advice, parties such as the Democratic National Committee and HFACC Inc. (also known as ‘Hillary for America’) could consider steps they would be legally entitled to take to challenge the validity of the outcome of that election.”


Congressman Devin Nunes joined Maria Bartiromo to catch us up on what’s happening in the ongoing investigations of President Trump and others. Nunes discusses how important it is to find out what evidence there was to go ahead with an investigation…the answer is that there was NONE.

He discusses how there was no intelligence that passed from the “Five Eyes” (Australia, UK, New Zealand, Canada and the US) to our government. Dunes says they’re trying to figure out how the info got into the FBI’s hands (see below). What are the origins of the FBI’s Russia information? Did Obama go through backchannels and around US intel agencies to spy on Trump?

This is a major problem because it hurts trust between the US and their partners. Nunes says, “it’s really serious stuff”.

Bartiromo brings up whether Hillary Clinton was pulling the strings at the State Department to go after Trump. Nunes brings up the fact that Blumenthal was pushing information to the State Department.

Nunes says the Dems went for a collusion charge and now it’s obstruction but there’s no obstruction either. They’ve got nothing…

Releasing the Comey memos proves Trump is clear but Comey has much to answer for.

Bartiromo brings up McCabe and Comey going back and forth about who’s telling the truth. Who goes to the slammer? It’s looking like both men should go to jail.


Did Obama Go Around U.S. Intel to Spy on Trump…British Intel Chief Abruptly Resigns After Trump Inauguration [Video]

One person not mentioned in the investigation of spying on President Trump is the former director of British intel who abruptly resigned right after the Trump inauguration. Judge Napolitano was almost fired for opening up the can of worms to tell the truth on how Obama skirted U.S. intel agencies to use British intel to spy on Trump without getting caught. Has Robert Hannigan been interviewed? If not, we think he needs to be on the hot seat. He is a young guy and had finally reached the top of his game after being named director of GCHQ just two years prior.


Robert Hannigan, the director of GCHQ, has resigned from his job as head of one of the three Government intelligence agencies after just two years. GCHQ would only say that Mr Hannigan had left his post for “personal reasons” and that he was not sacked or subject to disciplinary proceedings.


“GCHQ director Robert Hannigan is stepping down after only two years as chief of the cyber spy agency for “personal reasons,” the intelligence service has announced.”

Recall also that Judge Napolitano said three sources told him the British spy agency had something to do with the witch hunt on Trump:
JUDGE NAPOLITANO was on FOX & Friends discussing the Obama administration’s efforts to spy on Donald Trump. Three intel sources have disclosed to the network that Obama went to British intelligence to get the goods on Trump, but we may never be able to prove it…
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: “Three intelligence sources have informed FOX News that President Obama went outside the chain of command. He didn’t use the NSA, he didn’t use the CIA, he didn’t use the FBI and he didn’t use the Department of Justice…He used *GCHQ.” *GCHQ is a British intel agency

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.