A new report just came out that provides information on Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s third accuser. The report suggests that Julie Swetnick’s ex-boyfriend filed a restraining order against her for some disturbing violence-related issues. This was back in 2001.

Swetnick accused Kavanaugh, Trump’s nominee for Supreme Court, of attending house parties where women were reportedly sexually assaulted. Swetnick has reportedly attended the same parties, multiple times, and was highly criticized by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) for repeatedly going to parties where women were supposedly assaulted (including herself), but not telling anyone. Specifically, Graham said on video “If you went to a party once where people are being drugged and gang-raped, you wouldn’t go to the next nine, that you would tell somebody, and that you have an obligation if you see people being abused to come forward and say something about it, if not for yourself, for them.”

Swetnick, who is represented by attorney Michael Avenatti, dubbed the “Creepy Porn Lawyer” on Tucker Carlson’s show, faced the restraining order in Miami-Dade County.

As reported by Politico “a Miami-Dade County court docket shows a petition for injunction against Swetnick was filed March 1, 2001, by her former boyfriend, Richard Vinneccy, who told POLITICO Wednesday the two had dated for four years before they broke up.

Thirteen days later, the case was dismissed, not long after an affidavit of non-ability to advance fees was filed.

Trending: Former Police Captain Surrounded by Perps...Then Starts Shooting [Video]

According to Vinneccy, Swetnick threatened him after they broke up and even after he got married to his current wife and had a child.

“Right after I broke up with her, she was threatening my family, threatening my wife and threatening to do harm to my baby at that time,” Vinneccy said in a telephone interview with POLITICO. “I know a lot about her.”

Save up to 66% on MyPillow products. Use promo code FedUp, and save up to 66%.

“She’s not credible at all,” he said. “Not at all.”

Politico reports that Avenatti was reached on Wednesday and stated that he was not aware of the restraining order. He suggested that it was irrelevant and said “Complete nonsense. No truth to this at all. Her ex-boyfriend fraudulently used her resume to apply for and obtain jobs and was caught by her,” said Avenatti. “Why are you all attacking a sexual assault victim? Would that be appropriate in a court of law?”

If that’s Avenatti’s response to this, then it doesn’t actually make any sense. Based on Politico’s article, it seems like Avenatti went directly to ask why people are going after a sexual assault victim. That’s very defensive. Is that a strategy for someone who doesn’t have anything credible to share or discuss?

It is quite telling that Avenatti would go right on the defensive and suggest that people are attacking her, or even her credibility, when a restraining order that has something to do with threatening someone’s family, including a child, is involved.

The Politico article then stated that Swetnick provided a sworn statement claiming that she met Kavanaugh between 1980-1981 and went to over 10 house parties where he and Mike Judge were possibly in attendance. She is not accusing him of sexually assaulting her, but it seems like she just wants people to know that he was there when she was a victim of sexual assault by multiple boys.

So basically, she’s saying that he didn’t do it, but maybe he was there.

So why is she relevant? She produced a sworn statement that Kavanaugh didn’t sexually assault her, so what exactly is the point of her talking about this at all if not to just get five minutes of fame?

At this point, it doesn’t make sense why she’s called an accuser when she admits he didn’t do anything. Who is she accusing? It’s not Brett Kavanaugh, so why is she even relative right now? Why isn’t she going after the people who allegedly raped her? Like Graham said, why did she go back to these parties over 10 times if there was sexual assault going on? That doesn’t make sense either. She doesn’t sound credible one bit.

Her ex-boyfriend stated “I have a lot of facts, evidence, that what she’s saying is not true at all,” he said. “I would rather speak to my attorney first before saying more.”

Avenatti blasted the press for “digging into the past” of a woman who stepped forward and is willing to testify under oath” – which is ironic because that’s exactly what people are doing to Kavanaugh.

The ex-boyfriend is 63-years-old and a registered Democrat according to Miami-Dade records (per Politico’s article). Maybe he should have a lawyer and be ready to testify.

If Democrats are going to destroy Brett Kavanaugh, then one of them can pitch in to destroy Avenatti and Swetnick as well.

This is one huge mess that resembles a circus.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.