Earlier today, Raheem Kassam, editor in chief of the National Pulse, reported about how Twitter suspended former Trump campaign official Steve Cortes, for tweeting about a Stanford NIH study about the risks associated with wearing face masks.

Save up to 66% on MyPillow products. Use promo code FedUp, and save up to 66%.

NOQ wrote about the Stanford peer review report and how it’s been ignored by the media:

Did you hear about the peer-reviewed study done by Stanford University that demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that face masks have absolutely zero chance of preventing the spread of Covid-19? No? It was posted on the National Center for Biotechnological Information government website. The NCBI is a branch of the National Institute for Health, so one would think such a study would be widely reported by mainstream media and embraced by the “science-loving” folks in Big Tech.

Trending: Heavily Armed SWAT Team Wrestles Christian Pastor To Ground On Way Home From Church For “Inciting” People To Go To Church During COVID

Many countries across the globe utilized medical and non-medical facemasks as non-pharmaceutical intervention for reducing the transmission and infectivity of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Although, scientific evidence supporting facemasks’ efficacy is lacking, adverse physiological, psychological and health effects are established. Is has been hypothesized that facemasks have compromised safety and efficacy profile and should be avoided from use. The current article comprehensively summarizes scientific evidences with respect to wearing facemasks in the COVID-19 era, providing prosper information for public health and decisions making.

They continue:

Although several countries mandated wearing facemask in health care settings and public areas, scientific evidences are lacking supporting their efficacy for reducing morbidity or mortality associated with infectious or viral diseases. Therefore, it has been hypothesized: 1) the practice of wearing facemasks has compromised safety and efficacy profile, 2) Both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to reduce human-to-human transmission and infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, 3) Wearing facemasks has adverse physiological and psychological effects, 4) Long-term consequences of wearing facemasks on health are detrimental.

The author shares this stunning table showing the physiological and psychological effects of wearing a facemask and their potential health consequences:

The Gateway Pundit also reported about the Stanford study- A recent Stanford study released by the NCBI, which is under the National Institutes of Health, showed that masks do absolutely nothing to help prevent the spread of COVID-19 and their use is even harmful.

So if this peer-reviewed Stanford study is legitimate, and we have no reason to believe that it’s not, why is Dr. Fauci telling people to wear multiple masks and vaccinated people to continue wearing masks? Is wearing a mask more about conformity than preventing the spread of the Chinese coronavirus?

And why is our illegitimate “president” wearing double masks? Did Kamala Harris tell him it was a good idea to wear two masks?

 

 

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.