Democrat Mike Quigley wants to impeach President Trump over hearsay.

He’s trying to make the point that the two witnesses at the impeachment hearing might now have direct knowledge of ANYTHING but they have hearsay they can share.

The testimony was based on second-hand and third-hand information.

“Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct.”

Uh ??

Trending: Video: DC BLM/Antifa Harass the Wrong Man on the Street: “You think I’m afraid of you?”

So not only are the Democrats ADMITTING their entire impeachment sham is based off of hearsay, but now they’re trying to defend it. What a joke!

The two witnesses who testified in impeachment hearings were full of hearsay testimony:

Should Trump appoint a new Supreme Court Justice before the election?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Completing this poll entitles you to 100 Percent Fed Up updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime with a single click. Here's our Privacy Policy.

Republicans are doing a fantastic job of exposing the Democrats and their impeachment witnesses.

Rep. Jim Jordan just blasted the “star” impeachment witness who, as it turns out,  knows nothing.

“You were never on the call.” ~ Rep. Jim Jordan

Ambassador William Taylor has never met President Trump and was not even on the call with the President of Ukraine!

Rep. Jordan gets to the truth:

 4 facts will never change:

-The call transcript shows no linkage

– POTUS and Zelensky both say no pressure 

-Ukraine didn’t know aid was held up at the time of the call

-Ukraine never took any action to get aid released

“We know that from your deposition, in those 55 days that aide is delayed, you met with President Zelensky three times. … There was no linkage of security assistance dollars to investigating Burisma or the Bidens.”

Rep. Jordan called out Schiff for coordinating with the whistleblower:


Rep. Stefanik gets right to the point:

Trump has been more supportive of Ukraine than Obama ever was:


Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.