For some odd reason, a certain contingent of the population is trying to downplay how serious of a problem child sex trafficking has become.
This is evident by the fact that many leftists have reacted negatively to Jim Caviezel’s new movie “Sound of Freedom.”
The movie seems to have rattled many of them in a major way, which begs a serious question:
Why?
Why would anyone have a problem with Jim Caviezel bringing attention to something like this?
We can only speculate on the answer to that question of course.
However, here’s another question…
Why did the DOJ suddenly remove three sections from their areas of concern on their website on Child Sex Trafficking?
“International Sex Trafficking of Minors,” “Domestic Sex Trafficking of Minors,” and “Child Victims of Prostitution” were removed from the website on May 12, 2023.
EXCLUSIVE: Biden’s DOJ Eliminates Language on Child Sex Trafficking from Government Website and Child Victims of Prostitution – After Losing Track of 85,000 Migrant Children https://t.co/hy02i3SEqj
— The Gateway Pundit (@gatewaypundit) July 11, 2023
The Gateway Pundit tackled this very question:
Why did the DOJ remove “International Sex Trafficking of Minors”, “Domestic Sex Trafficking of Minors” and “Child Victims of Prostitution” from the Department of Justice website under Child Sex Trafficking?
The Biden administration removed these sections on May 12, 2023.
Why would they remove these important sections?
BREAKING: Biden's DOJ has removed child sex trafficking from it's list of "areas of concern."
— Leading Report (@LeadingReport) July 11, 2023
BREAKING: Biden's DOJ has removed child sex trafficking from it's list of "areas of concern."
— Patrick Webb (@RealPatrickWebb) July 11, 2023
Some Twitter users provided screenshots:
🚨🚨🚨
The DOJ's “Child Sex Trafficking” webpage removed 3 sections – “International Sex Trafficking of Minors,” “Domestic Sex Trafficking of Minors,” and “Child Victims of Prostitution” – from its areas of concern.
Why would they remove this content unless of course they are… pic.twitter.com/nUpxXXKlyx
— Paul Kikos 🌐 (@PKikos) July 11, 2023
🚨🚨🚨
The DOJ's "Child Sex Trafficking" webpage removed 3 sections – “International Sex Trafficking of Minors,” “Domestic Sex Trafficking of Minors,” and “Child Victims of Prostitution" – from its areas of concern.
The Swamp Hole Runs Real Deep… pic.twitter.com/hXBQXBzSk0
— MikeL #SaveTheChildren (@LorriganMichael) July 11, 2023
The DOJ's "Child Sex Trafficking" webpage removed 3 sections – “International Sex Trafficking of Minors,” “Domestic Sex Trafficking of Minors,” and “Child Victims of Prostitution" – Apparently these are not areas that concern the DOJ any more, nbd, nothing to see here.
Check for… pic.twitter.com/ZZlEaSW1U9— AlphaFo𝕏 (@Alphafox78) July 11, 2023
🚨🚨🚨
The DOJ's "Child Sex Trafficking" webpage removed 3 sections – “International Sex Trafficking of Minors,” “Domestic Sex Trafficking of Minors,” and “Child Victims of Prostitution" – from its areas of concern. pic.twitter.com/plxtoI08jb
— Natalie Winters (@nataliegwinters) July 10, 2023
Natalie Winters discussed this with Tim Pool:
Joe Biden removed international sex trarricking of minors from the DOJ’s areas of concern.
Seriously. pic.twitter.com/FqkIA4gQk4
— Natalie Winters (@nataliegwinters) July 11, 2023
Again I ask, why?
Biden's DOJ is now deleting language about child sex trafficking from their website.
What in the world do they think they're accomplishing with this?
I'd hate to be called a conspiracy theorist for talking about this, but you and I both know that this isn't normal!…
— Caroline Kane for Congress (@CarolineKaneTX) July 11, 2023
Why did Biden's DOJ remove child sex trafficking from its list of "areas of concern."
— Rob (@_ROB_29) July 11, 2023
ICYMI
Biden's DOJ has removed child sex trafficking from it's list of "areas of concern."
Anyone surprised?
— Spitfire (@DogRightGirl) July 11, 2023