We continue to shoot massive holes in Kamala Harris’ so-called “huge crowds”…

Very early on we reported that Kamala Harris’ crowds looked strange…

The people looked a bit off….

Some had 4 arms….

The iPhone screens never seemed to show what they were pointed at….

Reflections in things like shiny airplanes never showed any crowd in the reflection…

The tail of the alleged Kamala plane didn’t have any tailnumbers….

And on and on and on.

So what happened next?

As usual, what happened next is the Democrats took the path of least resistance: if you can’t make an image that looks real, just blur it out!

So that’s exactly what they did.

Suddenly, I started noticing that every single Kamala Harris Rally now looks like a Green Screen.

Can you see it?

I posted a full report last night and I’ll repost it down below in case you missed it.

CAN YOU SEE? Why Do Kamala Harris’ Rallies All Look Like This Now?

Problem solved!

With a blurred out background and/or a Green Screen recording, no one can scrutinize the AI crowd because no one can SEE the AI crowd.  It's just a bunch of blurry shapes and colors.

Simple!

At least, until this morning.

This morning I was on CNN (I know, shudder!) and I saw this image pop up:

It caught my eye because the background wasn't blurred.

So I took a closer look and I'm telling you this looks EXACTLY like an AI-generated image to me.

Let's zoom in a I'll show you what I mean.

Here's a zoom-in to the left side:

And here's the right side:

Those people look very fake....

They look computer generated to me.

What do you think?

Actually, I'm interested in what you think but I'm also very interested in what the AI-detection software thinks.

So I ran it through two different websites and here are the results:

Here's the first one, coming in at 64% likely to be Artificial (Fake AI):

And here's the second one, coming in at 63% likely to be Fake AI:

How interesting!

Both websites came up with almost the exact same answer -- 63/64% likely to be a fake AI-generated image!

So why 64% and not 90%?

I think that's where the green screen comes in.

I think just like any time you use a Green Screen, the person in the front is real, so I do think Kamala Harris speaking in the foreground is real.

And I think that's why you get numbers like 36% Human/Real, because it's seeing the Kamala Harris foreground as real.

Then the 64% Fake (AI) is taking into account the background, which is a fake AI-generated image rolled over the top of a Green Screen.

Is ANYTHING about this campaign real?

I can't find any evidence of anything genuine.

Fake.

Fake.

Fake.

Here's the report we published just last night in case you missed it:

CAN YOU SEE? Why Do Kamala Harris' Rallies All Look Like This Now?

Ok folks, it's getting weirder and weirder!

(And faker and faker)

Just last week, we brought you bombshell reports exposing how the crowds at Kamala Harris' Rallies (at least large portions of them) were fake.

Fake AI creations.

See here:

BUSTED! Can You Spot THE PROOF That Kamala’s Crowd is Fake?

And then even President Trump started talking about it:

CONFIRMED: President Trump Calls Out Kamala Harris’ FAKE Crowds!

So....what do you do when you get busted and caught red-handed faking images of crowds?

Simple!  You make sure that no one can see the crowd ever again.

You blur it!

Can't point out the obvious AI fakes if the crowd is blurred!

I'm not making this up....see for yourself -- I first started noticing it yesterday -- take a look and notice how the crowd is suddenly blurred out and hard to see:

It's even worse and more noticeable here:

Full screen video player here:

It looks like a Green Screen to me....

CLASSIC green screen look: the subject is clear and the rest feels oddly disconnected:

I'm not the only one picking up on it....

My friend BrainstormJoe called it a "CGI Campaign" and I think that's a great description:

If you think this is real, you might be in drastic need of a Red Pill:

So now let's expand the analysis and go deeper....

Is this normal?

Maybe it's not weird at all?

Maybe it's extremely normal to blur out the crowd behind you?

Except....I checked, and it's not.

In fact, you ALWAYS want to show the crowd so you can see the excitement behind the candidate and read their signs, etc.

That's why you NEVER see the crowd blurred....before now.

Here is Obama with a clear crowd:

It was harder to find one from Joe Biden because he doesn't do hardly any, but I found some clips here.....

Clear audience:

Even Hillary Clinton had a clear crowd:

Then I went way back, and Reagan of course had a clear crowd, no blurring:

And of course the master, President Trump LOVES to show the crowd.

Why?

Because it's REAL.

I guess our report really scared them so much they went to a new level of FAKERY!

Here was our original report EXPOSING the SCAM crowds in case you missed it:

BUSTED! Can You Spot THE PROOF That Kamala's Crowd is Fake?

Here's a fun game you can all play with the whole family.

It's brought to you by the people over at Kamala Harris' rally.

It's called What's Wrong With This Picture?

Gather the kids around.

They may do better than you think.

How do you play?

Simple.

Just watch this short clip and see What's Wrong With This Picture?

Write down your observation.

And then compare your answers.

Whoever wins gets a prize. I'll leave that up to you. (Ice-cream & a movie night is always a favorite)

READY?

Set...

GO!

Okay, did you catch it?

Did you see them?

There's 2 correct answers.

The first answer is...

#1 The Tail Number

Every plane has it...but not this one. Is it AI?

The next answer is right next to Kamala...

 #2 The Reflection

Let's get a better shot of that.

Zoom in...

Maybe the crowd were all vampires?

Hey, it's possible.

But then again, they'd be sparkling in the sun.

So if you got both answers right, I suggest you win a movie night. Might as well watch Twilight.

Maybe we can tell the liberals about this?

Though they do seem to act like they have hearing damage.

Speaking of movies, are we already watching 0ne?

This could explain the missing # on the tail. Perhaps it was AI all along?

This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport.

View the original article here.

 

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.