Mountains of evidence of voter fraud and intimidation by Wayne County election workers, Democrats, and leftist agitators by GOP and Independent poll challengers continue to accumulate in the state of Michigan. Massive mail-in vote irregularities like the ones discovered on the PA government website by “Greg On The Right,” a young internet sleuth (see video below) are also calling into question the integrity of the November election.

Watch:

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by 100% FED UP! (@100percentfedup)

Trending: Breaking Video: Mind-Blowing Testimony from Data Scientist in Pennsylvania Claiming “47 USB Cards Missing”

While the Democrat Party’s mainstream media is mocking the efforts of President Trump’s lawyers to expose the massive voter fraud in America, with particular emphasis on critical swing states, John Soloman of Just The News is reporting that FEC Chair Trey Trainor is taking these claims very seriously.

Just The News –  The Trump campaign is bringing “legitimate accusations” to court through affidavits of credible witnesses and other evidence used in its challenges to electoral outcomes in various states, Federal Election Commission Chairman Trey Trainor said.

Trainor said his review of the evidence, including numerous affidavits claiming voter fraud and a sworn statement by a prominent mathematician flagging up to 100,000 Pennsylvania ballots, met the first level of legal scrutiny under what’s known as motion to dismiss or “Rule 12(b)(6)” of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which would dismiss less credible claims.

Noting the subsequent legal threshold beyond a “motion to dismiss” is the “summary judgment phase,” Trainor said that under this phase, the credibility of witnesses is presumed to be accurate, especially given the caliber of the testimonies Trainor has observed to date.

“When considering a motion for summary judgment, a judge will view all evidence in the light most favorable to the movant’s opponent,” explains Cornell University Law School’s Legal Information Institute website.

“What I would be concerned with, if I were on the other side of these election contests that are going on around the country, is that if you look at the level of evidence that has been provided by these affidavits — hundreds of affidavits that corroborate events that have happened on the ground — in a summary judgment phase of these cases, you have to take the evidence of the plaintiff as being true,” Trainor told “Just the News AM” television show Friday morning.

Do you think Democrats cheated in the election?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Completing this poll entitles you to 100 Percent Fed Up updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime with a single click. Here's our Privacy Policy.

“The court has to take the evidence of the plaintiff as being true and see whether or not the other side can make a case against it,” added Trainor. “So, the massive amounts of affidavits that we see in these cases show that there was in fact fraud that took place. And the other side really needs to answer these questions.”

With the Trump campaign’s lawsuits in targeted battleground states across the country in various phases of progress through the courts, Trainor said, “At the end of the day, what I would say is that these are legitimate accusations that are going to be tried in court.”

“And we need to let this legal process play out,” Trainor added, “so that we come to a valid conclusion to this election that everybody believes to be legitimate.”

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.