The President Trump administration is turning up the heat on far-left activists who traveled to communist Cuba earlier this year.
Federal officials have served subpoenas to Marxist political streamer Hasan Piker and CodePink co-founder Medea Benjamin as part of a Treasury Department investigation into whether U.S. organizations and individuals violated American sanctions on the Cuban regime.
The subpoenas are tied to a March trip connected to the so-called Nuestra America Convoy, a caravan effort organized by left-wing groups that is now under scrutiny under longstanding U.S. sanctions policy.
The investigation is being run through the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, or OFAC, which administers and enforces U.S. economic sanctions programs, including comprehensive restrictions on Cuba.
As Fox News reported, the subpoenas are administrative requests for information as part of a wider probe into whether activists violated U.S. laws and sanctions in supporting Cuba’s communist government.
No formal criminal charges have been reported against either Piker or Benjamin at this stage.
The subpoenas are investigative tools, and the escalation is the formal records demand now aimed at high-profile left-wing figures tied to the Cuba trip.
Piker, one of the most prominent far-left political streamers in the country, has made a career out of promoting Marxist ideology to millions of young viewers. Benjamin co-founded CodePink, a left-wing activist organization with a long history of anti-American protest activity and sympathetic engagement with hostile foreign governments.
According to CiberCuba, Piker has broken his silence on the subpoena, though details of his full response remain limited.
Florida Senator Rick Scott was not shy about where he stands on the matter.
Scott’s reaction captures the core issue.
These were not quiet academic observers visiting Cuba to study its history. They were high-profile American activists who traveled to a sanctioned communist nation, stayed in luxury accommodations, and, according to critics such as Senator Rick Scott, ignored Cuban political prisoners.
U.S. sanctions on Cuba exist for a reason.
The Cuban regime has brutalized its own people for decades, jailing dissidents, crushing free speech, and driving millions to flee across the Florida Straits. OFAC regulations are designed to prevent American dollars and political legitimacy from flowing to that regime.
Whether Piker and Benjamin crossed a legal line is now a matter for federal investigators to determine. The subpoenas suggest the Treasury Department believes the question is serious enough to pursue formally.
For years, far-left activists have treated solidarity trips to communist nations as consequence-free virtue signaling. The Trump administration appears to be reminding them that U.S. sanctions are law, not a suggestion.
Fox News put the subpoena story in front of a national audience:
Federal officials have served subpoenas to Marxist political influencer Hasan Piker and CodePink cofounder Susan Medea Benjamin as part of a wider investigation into whether U.S. organizations and leaders violated U.S. laws and sanctions in supporting Cuba's communist regime, Fox…
— Fox News (@FoxNews) May 24, 2026
Senator Rick Scott was blunt about why he welcomed the investigation:
Good. Hasan Piker and Code Pink went to Cuba, stayed in five star hotels, cozied up with thugs in the communist regime, and completely IGNORED the innocent political prisoners being starved and tortured.
They should be thoroughly investigated and held accountable for ANY laws…
— Rick Scott (@SenRickScott) May 24, 2026
Fox News laid out the core federal investigation this way:
Federal officials served subpoenas to Hasan Piker and CodePink co-founder Susan Medea Benjamin as part of a wider investigation into whether U.S. organizations and leaders violated U.S. laws and sanctions while supporting Cuba’s communist regime.
The inquiry focuses on activists who traveled to Cuba in March.
Investigators are examining whether sanctions were violated through financing, coordination, delivery of goods, or contacts with Cuban government personnel or entities.
The administrative subpoenas were Requests for Information sent by Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control.
ADVERTISEMENTThose RFIs seek financial, logistical and communications information tied to the trips.
The trip involved delegations of the Nuestra America Convoy, also called Our America Convoy.
The broader dragnet includes as many as 40 American citizens, and additional subpoenas are expected.
Delegation members may also have stayed at a hotel on the State Department’s Cuba Restricted List.
That is why this story is bigger than one streamer getting a letter from Washington.
It is a federal look at whether high-profile left-wing activism crossed a legal line while engaging with communist Cuba.
Anadolu Agency added this outside confirmation and legal framing:
U.S. authorities issued subpoenas to a political commentator and an anti-war activist over recent Cuba trips and possible sanctions or travel-regulation violations.
The inquiry is being led by Treasury’s OFAC and examines possible breaches of U.S. law related to Cuba sanctions.
ADVERTISEMENTThe subpoenas sought financial, travel and communications records tied to a March Cuba visit involving up to 40 U.S. citizens.
The convoy involved activists, influencers, and political organizations traveling to Havana with supplies.
Participants also took part in events organized by groups supportive of the Cuban government.
Possible meetings with Cuban officials are part of the factual picture investigators are examining.
The probe could remain a civil enforcement matter handled by OFAC.
Depending on the facts, it could also develop into a criminal case under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
For now, the public fact pattern is subpoena, records request, and sanctions inquiry.
That caution matters because subpoenas are serious, but they are not the same thing as a conviction.
CiberCuba reported the reaction from Piker, Benjamin, and Senator Rick Scott:
Piker responded after being subpoenaed by comparing the investigation to what he called the impunity of the Epstein class.
Benjamin responded by asking whether bringing medical supplies to pediatric hospitals in Cuba is now a crime.
The Nuestra America Convoy arrived in Havana on March 21, 2026 with about 650 delegates from 33 countries and 120 organizations.
The convoy reported transporting nearly 20 tons of humanitarian aid, including food, medicine, and solar panels.
The CodePink delegation included around 160 people.
That delegation delivered 6,000 pounds of aid directly to Cuba’s Ministry of Health.
Senator Rick Scott praised the investigation and said Piker and CodePink stayed in five-star hotels, mingled with communist-regime figures, and ignored political prisoners.
Scott called for a thorough investigation and accountability for any laws that may have been broken.
No formal criminal charges have been reported against Piker, Benjamin, or other convoy participants.
That leaves the public fight exactly where it belongs for now: records, compliance, and whether the activists followed U.S. sanctions law.
U.S. Treasury OFAC explains the official Cuba sanctions backdrop:
OFAC administers regulations with regard to the Cuba sanctions.
The agency’s Cuba Sanctions page provides FAQs, guidance, licensing resources, civil penalties and enforcement information.
OFAC says certain Cuba-related activities may be allowed if licensed by the agency.
The same page points users to an online license application for transactions that would otherwise be prohibited.
That official context is important because the legal question is not whether activists can claim humanitarian or political motives.
The question is whether their travel, transactions, goods, services, or contacts fit inside an authorized category or required licensing.
That is why an OFAC Request for Information can matter even before any criminal charge exists.
It gives federal investigators a way to demand records and test the activists’ public story against the sanctions rules.
It also means the paper trail matters: receipts, travel records, communications, and licensing status can become the difference between a lawful trip and a sanctions problem.
This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.






