In a transcribed interview with the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, former NIH Director Dr. Francis Collins confirmed there was no scientific evidence backing the six-foot social distancing rule during the COVID-19 scamdemic.

“Today, Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Chairman Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) released the transcript from Dr. Francis Collins’s transcribed interview. Dr. Collins helped lead the government’s COVID-19 pandemic response as the Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) until his resignation at the end of 2021. In conjunction with the transcript, the Select Subcommittee also released a new staff memo that highlights the key takeaways from Dr. Collins’s transcribed interview,” the subcommittee wrote.

“Dr. Collins testified that the ‘6 feet apart’ social distancing recommendation promoted by federal health officials was likely not based on any science or data,” the subcommittee wrote.

“Do you recall science or evidence that supported the six-foot distance?” the majority counsel asked Collins.

“I do not,” Collins answered.

“Is that I do not recall or I do not see any evidence supporting six feet?” Counsel asked.

“I did not see evidence, but I’m not sure I would have been shown evidence at that point,” Collins answered.

“Since then, it has been an awfully large topic. Have you seen any evidence since then supporting six feet?” Counsel asked.

“No,” Collins replied.

Image

National Review reports:

Collins was the boss of Dr. Anthony Fauci, who was the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases during the pandemic. And his testimony is similar to Fauci’s, who admitted to the subcommittee that the six-foot guidance just appeared.

Fauci invited Collins to the February 2020 call that set in motion the publication of the “Proximal Origin” paper in Nature that attempted to discredit the lab-leak hypothesis at the start of the pandemic, Collins testified. Before the phone call, Collins said he had not expressed an opinion on whether the virus came from a lab.

Afterward, he said, he did because he trusted the experts. Collins defended his decision by asserting the need to challenge claims that the coronavirus was engineered by humans.

The subcommittee implicated Collins and Fauci in a report published last year on how top public-health officials orchestrated the “Proximal Origins” paper. In an email after the February 1, 2020, conference call, Collins warned of the “voices of conspiracy” doing harm to science. He later influenced the substance of the “Proximal Origins” paper.

“Dr. Collins stated that the COVID-19 lab-leak hypothesis is not a conspiracy theory,” the subcommittee noted.

“Dr. Collins testified that he was unaware of ANY NIH policies that ensure proper oversight of foreign labs. This means that NIH often lacks the necessary expertise to ensure U.S. taxpayer funds are spent safely,” the subcommittee added.

As 100 Percent Fed Up noted, an NIH official finally admitted American taxpayer dollars funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Lab before the COVID-19 scamdemic.

NIH Official Makes Long-Awaited Gain-Of-Function Research Admission

Per Zero Hedge:

As the COVID-19 outbreak spread in 2020, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued guidance describing social distancing to include staying away from congregant settings, avoiding mass gatherings, and maintaining a distance of at least six feet from others when possible.

The CDC’s latest guidance on respiratory virus infection prevention (updated on April 4, 2024) includes a section on physical distancing. It indicates that putting physical distance between oneself and others can help lower the risk of spreading a respiratory virus.

“There is no single number that defines a ’safe’ distance, since spread of viruses can depend on many factors,” the guidance states, which comports with studies such as one from 2021 that concluded that the one-size-fits-all six-foot physical distancing rule is invalid.

However, the CDC’s latest guidance for healthcare settings, updated on March 18, 2024, makes several references to six feet. For instance, it recommends that in dental facilities with open floor plans, one strategy to prevent the spread of COVID-19 is to ensure “at lest 6 feet of space between patient chairs.” It also defines “close contact” between individuals as “being within 6 feet for a cumulative total of 15 minutes or more over a 24-hour period with someone with SARS-CoV-2 infection.”

The Epoch Times has reached out to the CDC with a request for comment on Dr. Collins’s remarks and for clarification on what scientific basis the agency incorporated the six-foot figure into its COVID-19 prevention guidance.

Read the complete transcript of the interview with Dr. Francis Collins HERE.

RELATED REPORT:

U.K. government data reveals young people are DYING of cancer at “explosive” rates, following COVID years and vaccine push

Government data from the United Kingdom has revealed that teenagers and young people in their 20s to 40s are dying from rapidly metastasizing and terminal cancers at “explosive” rates since the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) began.

Article by Zoey Sky, republished with permission from Naturalnews.com

The 45-page analysis was conducted by COVID-19 researcher and former Wall Street hedge fund manager Edward Dowd, whose report became a cause for concern among many oncologists, who cited it as a “sharp reversal of decades of mortality data” that showed a decrease in the number of people succumbing to cancer.

Dowd based his analysis on readily available government statistics from the U.K.’s Office for National Statistics.

To gather data for the report, Dowd and his research partners, who include a handful of high-level scientists, data analysts and financial experts, studied all International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, (ICD-10) codes for cause of death in the U.K. from 2010 to 2022. Dowd and the research team looked into trends in malignant neoplasms (C00 to C99 codes).

ICD-10 codes are the international physicians’ classification of diagnosis, symptom and procedure for claim processing set by the World Health Organization (WHO) and a malignant neoplasm is a cancerous tumor.

The researchers observed a noticeable pattern: Even though almost all deaths among older people in 2021 and 2022 in Wales and England had been coded, eight percent of deaths among 15- to 44-year-olds in 2021 and 30 percent of deaths in that age group in 2022 hadn’t been coded yet.

Dowd explained that when someone dies in a hospital, they “leave a trail of life and death with indications of what led to the death.” And if a young person dies at the wheel of a car or in their sleep, an investigation is conducted and it takes some time to assign the cause of death. He added that the missing codes are “indicative of the problem” of excess deaths among young people.

However, even with the caveat of missing codes, the remaining 92 percent of coded deaths in 2021 and 70 percent of coded deaths in 2022 suggested “a strong signal of cancer deaths in the young.”

Dowd said the researchers observed a significant increase in mortality because of malignant neoplasms that started in 2021 and accelerated substantially in 2022. He wrote that the increase in “excess deaths in 2022 is highly statistically significant (extreme event).”

Cancer death rates increased significantly after COVID-19 vaccine rollout

Dowd produced the report in his Humanity Projects study of excess deaths in the U.K. and the U.S. using government and insurance industry data. The growing body of clinical evidence connecting burgeoning cancers in young people to the COVID-19 vaccines inspired Dowd to conduct the research.

Their research focused on younger individuals aged 15 to 44 because it is currently a topic of particular interest because of the rise in anecdotal evidence of many unexplained aggressive and unusual cancers, such as “turbo cancers” occurring in the population, especially in younger individuals.

Dowd explained that the aim of the study was not to examine individual claims and anecdotes, but to provide “a statistical analysis at a population level and clarify if the anecdotal evidence is abnormal or not.” Dowd hopes that the potential connections identified in their study can be used as “a basis for a reality check for health professionals to understand underlying trends in individuals’ health.”

For the study, Dowd and the researchers compared excess death rates and the difference between observed deaths and the baseline for expected deaths before and after the coronavirus pandemic.

Dowd established a baseline of normal cancer death rates from 2010 to 2020 that remained consistent with few deviations, at least until the cancer death rates increased significantly in late 2021 in the U.K. after the COVID-19 vaccine rollout.

Dowd highlighted that the research was one of the first to try and identify “some patterns that are observed in trends” in cancer post-2020. (Related: TURBO CANCER: Children are DYING within hours or days of leukemia diagnosis, often after receiving vaccine jabs.)

Watch this clip to learn more about turbo cancers and COVID-19 deaths.

This video is from the Fritjof Persson channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

Health Canada confirms that Pfizer COVID-19 injections contain SV40 DNA sequence that can cause CANCER.

Dr. McCullough warns: Getting jabbed multiple times with mRNA COVID “vaccines” could promote “turbo cancer.”

Pancreatic cancer rates skyrocket as Covid jabs and boosters send toxic spike protein prions into vital organs, including the pancreas, fueling turbo cancer.

Sources include:

GlobalResearch.ca

ChildrensHealthDefense.org

Brighteon.com

RELATED ARTICLE:

Molecule Found In Beef And Dairy Can Kill Cancer Cells, Study Suggests

According to a new study, a molecule found in beef and dairy improves the immune response to cancer.

“Scientists at UChicago discover that trans-vaccenic acid (TVA), a fatty acid found in beef, lamb, and dairy products, improves the ability of immune cells to fight tumors,” The University of Chicago Biological Sciences Division wrote Wednesday.

The researchers determined that “cancer patients with higher levels of the compound in their blood responded better to treatment, suggesting that it could have major benefits as a nutritional supplement,” Daily Mail reports.

WATCH:

“The research, published this week in Nature, also shows that patients with higher levels of TVA circulating in the blood responded better to immunotherapy, suggesting that it could have potential as a nutritional supplement to complement clinical treatments for cancer,” The University of Chicago Biological Sciences Division stated.

“There are many studies trying to decipher the link between diet and human health, and it’s very difficult to understand the underlying mechanisms because of the wide variety of foods people eat. But if we focus on just the nutrients and metabolites derived from food, we begin to see how they influence physiology and pathology,” said Jing Chen, PhD, the Janet Davison Rowley Distinguished Service Professor of Medicine at UChicago and one of the senior authors of the new study.

“By focusing on nutrients that can activate T cell responses, we found one that actually enhances anti-tumor immunity by activating an important immune pathway,” Chen added.

From The University of Chicago Biological Sciences Division:

Chen’s lab focuses on understanding how metabolites, nutrients and other molecules circulating in the blood influence the development of cancer and response to cancer treatments. For the new study, two postdoctoral fellows, Hao Fan, PhD and Siyuan Xia, PhD, both co-first authors, assembled a “blood nutrient” compound library consisting of 255 bioactive molecules derived from nutrients. They screened the compounds in this new library for their ability to influence anti-tumor immunity by activating CD8+ T cells, a group of immune cells critical for killing cancerous or virally infected cells.

After the scientists evaluated the top six candidates in both human and mouse cells, they saw that TVA performed the best. TVA is the most abundant trans fatty acid present in human milk, but the body cannot produce it on its own. Only about 20% of TVA is broken down into other byproducts, leaving 80% circulating in the blood. “That means there must be something else it does, so we started working on it more,” Chen said.

The researchers then conducted a series of experiments with cells and mouse models of diverse tumor types. Feeding mice a diet enriched with TVA significantly reduced the tumor growth potential of melanoma and colon cancer cells compared to mice fed a control diet. The TVA diet also enhanced the ability of CD8+ T cells to infiltrate tumors.

The team also performed a series of molecular and genetic analyses to understand how TVA was affecting the T cells. These included a new technique for monitoring transcription of single-stranded DNA called kethoxal-assisted single-stranded DNA sequencing, or KAS-seq, developed by Chuan He, PhD, the John T. Wilson Distinguished Service Professor of Chemistry at UChicago and another senior author of the study. These additional assays, done by both the Chen and He labs, showed that TVA inactivates a receptor on the cell surface called GPR43 which is usually activated by short-chain fatty acids often produced by gut microbiota. TVA overpowers these short-chain fatty acids and activates a cellular signaling process known as the CREB pathway, which is involved in a variety of functions including cellular growth, survival, and differentiation. The team also showed that mouse models where the GPR43 receptor was exclusively removed from CD8+ T cells also lacked their improved tumor fighting ability.

Daily Mail reports:

Fatty cuts of beef and lamb are more likely to have higher levels of TVA compared to lean cuts, as are whole milk and full-fat dairy products compared to low-fat and skim.

The anti-cancer power of the dairy-derived fatty acid comes from its ability to turbocharge certain immune cells known as T cells, which recognize foreign invaders and prompt the immune system to kill them.

Researchers said that eating foods rich in this compound or giving it to cancer patients as a supplement could have measurable benefits in decreasing the size of tumors.

Dr Jing Chen, senior author of the study, said: ‘By focusing on nutrients that can activate T cell responses, we found one that actually enhances anti-tumor immunity by activating an important immune pathway.’

Her team identified the nutrient after combing through a database of around 700 different metabolites – substances produced when the body breaks down food – all of which came from food.

Read the abstract for the study, titled “Trans-vaccenic acid reprograms CD8+ T cells and anti-tumour immunity,” at Nature:

Diet-derived nutrients are inextricably linked to human physiology by providing energy and biosynthetic building blocks and by functioning as regulatory molecules. However, the mechanisms by which circulating nutrients in the human body influence specific physiological processes remain largely unknown. Here we use a blood nutrient compound library-based screening approach to demonstrate that dietary trans-vaccenic acid (TVA) directly promotes effector CD8+ T cell function and anti-tumour immunity in vivo. TVA is the predominant form of trans-fatty acids enriched in human milk, but the human body cannot produce TVA endogenously1. Circulating TVA in humans is mainly from ruminant-derived foods including beef, lamb and dairy products such as milk and butter2,3, but only around 19% or 12% of dietary TVA is converted to rumenic acid by humans or mice, respectively4,5. Mechanistically, TVA inactivates the cell-surface receptor GPR43, an immunomodulatory G protein-coupled receptor activated by its short-chain fatty acid ligands6,7,8. TVA thus antagonizes the short-chain fatty acid agonists of GPR43, leading to activation of the cAMP–PKA–CREB axis for enhanced CD8+ T cell function. These findings reveal that diet-derived TVA represents a mechanism for host-extrinsic reprogramming of CD8+ T cells as opposed to the intrahost gut microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids. TVA thus has translational potential for the treatment of tumours.

RELATED (now is it starting to make sense why they want to BAN red meat?):

Have You Heard Of “Ruminant Meats”?

Have you heard of “Ruminant Meats”?

I like to think I stay up on things, but that was a new term for me, which I just learned today.

And it actually blew my mind. 🤯

Perhaps I can blow your mind too….

Listen to this INCREDIBLE video explaining all the benefits and then ask yourself: “Does it make sense now why they’re trying so hard to BAN red meat?”

Watch safely here on Rumble — trust me, watch the WHOLE thing beginning to end:

Here’s more on their incredible health benefits:

Ruminant meats, derived from animals with a specialized stomach known as the rumen, include beef, lamb, goat, and venison. These meats are known for their distinctive flavor and nutritional content. Here’s an overview of their benefits:

  1. High-Quality Protein: Ruminant meats are excellent sources of high-quality protein, essential for muscle growth, repair, and overall health. The protein in these meats contains all the essential amino acids needed by the human body.
  2. Rich in Vitamins and Minerals: These meats are rich in essential nutrients, including B vitamins (particularly B12), zinc, and iron. Vitamin B12 is crucial for nerve function and blood cell formation, while zinc and iron are vital for immune health and oxygen transportation in the blood, respectively.
  3. Source of Healthy Fats: Ruminant meats contain various fats, including omega-3 fatty acids, particularly in grass-fed varieties. These healthy fats are important for brain health and reducing inflammation.
  4. Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA): Grass-fed ruminant meats are a good source of CLA, a type of fat that has been linked to reduced body fat and improved immune function.
  5. Creatine and Carnosine: These meats are natural sources of creatine and carnosine, compounds beneficial for muscle and brain health.
  6. Satiety and Weight Management: The high protein and fat content in ruminant meats can lead to greater feelings of fullness, which can help with weight management by reducing overall calorie intake.
  7. Sustainable Farming Practices: When ruminant animals are raised in sustainable, grass-fed systems, they can contribute to the health of the ecosystem through natural grazing and fertilization processes.

So…now does it make sense why they want to ban red meat so much?

Of of course the Elites will still eat it!

But they need you WEAK and STRUGGLING.

Not me.

I will eat red meat until the day I die…and I am going to enjoy every bite along the way!

That would be REAL RED MEAT as God made it, not Plant Based Meat.

Joe Rogan Calls It Out: “Plant Based Meat Is REALLY Bad For You!”

Why do people like Bill Gates and all others on the Far Left with “God Complexes” feel the need to constantly reinvent meat?

They constantly want to play God, to create meat better than what God gave us.

Genesis makes very clear that God created plants and animals for our food, but that’s never good enough.

They always have to try and do their own version.

“Plant based meat”

“Lab grown beef”

“3D printed beef”

They’re throwing it all at us and I’m not touching ANY of it!

How about you?

Oh, not only that but they’ve killed so many cattle that we are at the LOWEST number of Beef Cattle on record since 1962!

Gee, you think that might have a big impact on prices?

Yup.

But keep reading to the bottom – I have a solution for you to all of this nonsense!

Now back to “Plant Based Meat”.

Think it’s good for you?

Think it’s healthy?

Think it’s good for the environment?

Wrong, Wrong and Wrong!

Watch this:

Now sometimes you just gotta laugh….

I love this reply:

The fact that “plant based meat” doesn’t exist anywhere in nature should tell you all you need to know:

But what do you do when red meat is disappearing from store shelves?

Being replaced with Lab Grown Meat?

Or Plant Based Meat?

Or mRNA injected Meat?

And even if you can find it, the prices are going through the roof!

**KEEP READING, I HAVE THE SOLUTION**

I’d like to introduce you to Black Angus beef, pasture raised on hundreds of thousands of acres.

Free roaming with plenty of open air between all the cattle.

Grass fed.

No hormones and no antibiotics.  Never!

Oh, and it’s CHEAPER than Omaha Steaks!

BOOM, who loves ya baby!

The only “catch”?

It’s Invite only.

Good thing you know someone that has the invites….(me!).

If you’d like to find out more and get a FREE personal invite, just go here and tell them Noah sent you:  https://SwitchWithNoah.com

It’s the real deal, and because they don’t raise the Black Angus like the big companies do, they may have the SHUT OFF invites if they grow too fast.

So if you want in, let me know soon.

And make sure you tell them you are interested in the Black Angus beef!

I know I tend to get concerned when I get messages from numbers I don’t recognize, but if you request a Free Invite (Link here) you WILL have someone from my Inner Circle reach out to you….so be ready!

These are awesome people, fellow patriots who love what we’re doing, and I think you’ll love getting a chance to talk with them.

And they’ll help get you all set up.

Who’s with me?

– Noah

p.s. Since everyone gets personal attention, we will take these in the order in which they come in.  So if you are excited, ask for your invite now or you might be far down on the list.  I have a great team, but they can only do so much and they’ll work on a first-come, first-served basis.

Request a free Invite here
 

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.