A law passed by The French National Assembly has created a firestorm of controversy amongst people opposed to mRNA treatments, including the experimental mRNA COVID-19 shots.

“France has now criminalized objections to the mRNA platform, exposing those targeted to ruinous fines and imprisonment. It’s obvious lunacy, and that it’s happening in a Western nation should alarm us all This madness must be defeated, in France, at the WHO, everywhere it arises,” Bret Weinstein wrote.

“France: any criticism of mRNA platform punishable with up to 3 years imprisonment and 45,000 euros,” Global Health Project President Dr. Kat Lindley said, citing a report by Thomas Oysmüller in TKP.

According to Oysmüller, critics have nicknamed the law “Article Pfizer.”

“Without much attention, a law was passed in France on Wednesday that could criminalize resistance to mRNA treatment. Anyone who advises against mRNA or other ‘medical treatments’ that are ‘obviously suitable’ for treatment based on the current state of medical knowledge can in future be imprisoned in France for up to three years or receive a fine of up to 45,000 euros,” Oysmüller writes (translated).

Biologist Annelise Bocquet expressed her shock regarding the law.

“To my international friends and colleagues, Today, a law was passed in France qualifying any opposition to mRNA-LNP injections as a ‘sectarian aberration’. It carries a penalty of up to 3 years’ imprisonment and 45,000 euros,” she said.

Annie Arnaud writes:

Today, 02/14/24, the French government basely maneuvered so that article 4 was adopted.

It is a highly liberticidal article which will not tolerate any criticism of the therapeutic treatments which will be recommended or made obligatory by the state.

Any person who dares to openly criticize these therapies will be liable to fines and imprisonment. Already, renowned doctors are being targeted, whom this article will silence.

France is taking a totalitarian turn, Macron and his henchmen are followers of the WEF and globalist policies.

It is a catastrophe for the country where a majority of citizens no longer obey vaccine propaganda. Social unrest ahead.

From TKP:

It was a hard-fought issue, but the Macron regime ultimately got its way. Article 4 is central to the new law, which was first deleted but then reinstated. This creates a new criminal offense and criminalizes the “ request to stop or refrain from therapeutic or prophylactic medical treatment” as well as “the request to use practices that are presented as therapeutic or prophylactic ”. This means that any resistance to mRNA treatment (and other corporate medical methods) can be criminalized in the future.

“The most explosive wording in the law that can be applied to the mRNA critics can be found in paragraph 2,” Oysmüller states.

* Source – Article 4 in original language provided by TKP *

Article 4 reads (translated):

After article 223-1-1 of the penal code, article 223-1-2 is inserted as follows:

Art. 223-1-2 . – Provocation to abandon or abstain from following therapeutic or prophylactic medical treatment is punishable by one year of imprisonment and a fine of 15,000 euros, when this abandonment or abstention is presented as beneficial for the health of the persons targeted when it is, in the state of medical knowledge, clearly likely to result in serious consequences for their physical or psychological health, taking into account the pathology from which they suffer.

“Provocation to adopt practices presented as having a therapeutic or prophylactic purpose for the persons concerned is punishable by the same penalties when it is, in the state of medical knowledge, clear that these practices expose them to an immediate risk of death. or injuries likely to result in mutilation or permanent disability.

“When the provocation provided for in the first two paragraphs has been followed by effects, the penalties are increased to three years of imprisonment and a fine of 45,000 euros.

“When these offenses are committed through the written or audiovisual press, the specific provisions of the laws which govern these matters are applicable with regard to the determination of the persons responsible.

X users reacted to the law:

The Naked Emperor wrote:

The law’s defenders claim it fights dangerous misinformation but opposition parties say it prejudges complementary medicine and threatens whistleblowers.

It initially failed when Article 4 was deleted, prompting accusations of an “alliance against science” from the majority. But the government maneuvered to reinstate Article 4 using an obscure parliamentary rule allowing “second consultations” at the request of the executive. The slightly reworded version passed 151-73 without debate.

Critics blast the move as undermining liberty. Florian Philippot of the Patriots party had pre-emptively labelled Article 4 a “Pfizer amendment” imposed by corporate interests. An observer called the law “blatant pre-fascism” meant to “punish, discipline, coerce.”

The amended bill now returns to the Senate, where opponents may still resist but the administration has methods to override them. Justification for the new law included warnings that “the next pandemic is coming.” However, the law’s critics say it uses public health as a pretext to suppress dissent.

Read the law, titled ‘Fight against sectarian aberrations’, HERE.

This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport.

View the original article here.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.