John Podesta is Hillary Clinton’s former campaign chairman so you know he’s a dirty bird. That’s why this is such a fun video to watch. Podesta had a brutal exchange on CBS’s “Face the Nation” on Sunday when asked about the campaign’s failure to focus on so-called “purple states” in 2016.

Host Nancy Cordes noted that an indictment handed down by special counsel Robert Mueller on Friday showed that Russian operatives who meddled in the election appeared to realize the importance of focusing on those battleground contests. Then she goes in for the kill with this question:

Trending: JUST IN: KAVANAUGH ACCUSER’S Lawyer Connected To Soros’ Open Society Foundation

“But it does beg the question, how is it that these Russian operatives knew to focus on purple states like Michigan and Wisconsin and your campaign didn’t?” LOL! That’s such a great snark-filled question!

take our poll - story continues below

Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to 100PercentFedUp.com updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

TRANSCRIPT OF FULL INTERVIEW:

NANCY CORDES: Welcome back to “Face the Nation.” I’m Nancy Cordes. Our next guest, John Podesta, was the chairman of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign. His private emails were hacked and released publicly by Russian-backed entities during the campaign. Mr. Podesta, thank you so much for being with us.

JOHN PODESTA: Nice to be back, Nancy.

NANCY CORDES: For anyone who voted for Hillary Clinton, these new indictments mean what?

JOHN PODESTA: Well, look, it’s a tragedy for the American people, really. As Mr. Mueller said in his indictment, this was an act of information warfare against the United States, against our democracy. So I think it’s, obviously, disappointing to those of us who were on the receiving end of these Russian active measures, but I think the real victims here are the American people because there, there was direct interference with our democratic institutions.

NANCY CORDES: The deputy attorney general was very careful on Friday to say that we don’t know whether or not this operation swayed the election. You’ve had a lot time think about this, where do you come down on that issue?

JOHN PODESTA: Well, look, this was one part of a, of a complex, active interference in the measures. This didn’t even deal with the hacking, this was only about what was going on in the social media and the, and the information campaign that was being done there, but there were 80 people, millions of dollars spent. And as one of your previous guests, Senator Coons noted, we won the popular vote by three million votes. They were pushing votes, just to give one example, to Jill Stein. Her vote in Michigan, in Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin was greater than the gap between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in those states. So you can’t prove that it did affect the outcome, but it certainly seems likely that it had some impact.

NANCY CORDES: But it does beg the question, how is it that these Russian operatives knew to focus on purple states like Michigan and Wisconsin, and your campaign didn’t?

JOHN PODESTA: Well, of course, we spent a lot of time, energy, and effort in all those states.

NANCY CORDES: Hillary Clinton, herself, did not spend much time in those states.

JOHN PODESTA: We, you know, we had — Tim Kaine was there, Barack Obama was in — and she spent enormous time in Pennsylvania and Michigan.

NANCY CORDES: Sure.

JOHN PODESTA: And we spent a lot of effort. We had more staff in Wisconsin than even President Obama had in 2012. But, but I think that begs the question, I think we, we focused on the places we thought were that were you know in contest, and at the end of the day, we fell short in those states. And I think that this active measures effort by the Russians could have tilted the election in, in Donald Trump’s favor. But I think what the real issue is, is how he’s reacted to that. And in that context, if we’re – if this is information warfare, then I think he’s the first draft-dodger in the war. I mean, he has done nothing but tried to undermine the Mueller investigation, he hasn’t implemented the sanctions that he — was passed by the congress and that he signed in reaction to the, to the activities in the 2016 election. We learned this week, he’s ordered no effort to try to get the intelligence community to get together to try to prevent further activities in the 2018 election.

NANCY CORDES: Why do you think that is? Do you think it’s because to do so would be to admit that somehow the Russians might have influenced this election?

JOHN PODESTA: Well, you know, I think that Mr. Trump’s psyche is complicated and people have said a lot, a lot about it, but he certainly can’t accept that this activity may have helped him, and I think he just constantly tries to move the ball away, including what was, I think, really a despicable tweet about the fact that he’s blaming the FBI for investigating the Russia investigation and somehow relating that to the tragic killings in Florida. But you know who knows with Mr. Trump? But he clearly, I think, has failed in carrying out his duty as president of the United States, which is to protect our democracy.

NANCY CORDES: Midterm elections are coming up, and it’s been reported that Democrats are telling your former boss, Bill Clinton, that in light of the Me Too movement, they, they think he should sit it out, he should be benched, and they’re not looking for him to actively campaign for them. Is that true? And do you think that that’s the right call?

JOHN PODESTA: Look, I think he remains, I think, a figure who is popular with a lot of Democrats across the country. And I think that people are calling him, candidates are calling him and asking for advice. But whether he’s going to be an active participant, I think that’s not you know really on the top of his mind right now. I think he’s doing other things, and, and people make their own judgments about whether he can be helpful in the campaign.

NANCY CORDES: Do you think it’s a good idea, very quickly, for him to sit it out?

JOHN PODESTA: Well, you know, look, I think that, that if I was advising a campaign and a candidate about what to do, I would, I would sort of judge whether he can be helpful. And I think some places he can be, and probably some places he’s more of a lightning rod.

NANCY CORDES: All right, John Podesta, thank you so much. Campaign chairman for Hillary Clinton. And we’ll be right back with our panel of Republicans who are leaving the House and Senate.


Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.