It’s pretty unreal that a woman like the one described below is to even be considered as credible in a case against a man of Judge Kavanaugh’s stature. This one case below is enough to disqualify her:

Julie Swetnick might have the tables turned on her with the latest news regarding a charge of “sexual misconduct”. Swetnick also lied about her education and work experience. She committed fraud by collecting unemployment while working for a company in D.C. There’s more but this is just what she did while employed by Webtrends.

After Swetnick issued a statement last week as the third accuser of Judge Brett Kavanaugh, we come to find out that Swetnick has a checkered past from 18 years ago and beyond. The case below is just one of many that Swetnick has had over the years.

Oregon Live reports

Webtrends alleged Swetnick claimed to have graduated from Johns Hopkins University but the company said it subsequently learned the school had no record of her attendance. Webtrends said she also “falsely described her work experience” at a prior employer.

Trending: BREAKING: Far-Left, Anti-Gun Actor Alec Baldwin Accidentally Shoots and Kills 42-Yr-Old Cinematographer and Wounds Director

The suit also alleges Swetnick “engaged in unwelcome, sexually offensive conduct” while at Webtrends and “made false and retaliatory allegations that other co-workers had engaged in inappropriate conduct toward her.”

The suit alleges Swetnick “engaged in unwelcome sexual innuendo and inappropriate conduct” directed at two male employees during a business lunch, with Webtrends customers present. Swetnick claimed two other employees had sexually harassed her, according to the suit.

Save up to 66% on MyPillow products. Use promo code FedUp, and save up to 66%.

Webtrends’ suit said it determined Swetnick had engaged in misconduct but could not find evidence to support her allegations against her colleagues. Later, the company alleged, Swetnick took medical leave and simultaneously claimed unemployment benefits in the District of Columbia.

In the suit, Webtrends alleged Swetnick threatened legal action against the company over her own harassment claims. The lawsuit claimed that act defamed the business and sought at least $150,000 on behalf of an employee that Swetnick had allegedly made false statements about.



Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.