A Republican Representative named Jim Lyons just earned major street cred after what happened with a legislative bill to add “Gender X” to the driver’s licenses in Massachusetts. It was reported that MA Democrats thought the bill would fly right through, but they didn’t expect Lyons to pull a maneuver that basically out-politically-corrected them.
Lyons got a bit tricky with his work and declared that using “Gender X” was discriminatory to all the other genders. What does that mean? Well, Lyons used “Facebook’s established 73 genders as the baseline” and they suggested that just adding one additional gender was not fair to the other 72 genders. That’s called discrimination and such ruling required whoever was pushing for the fake gender to be added to a driver’s license they had to include the other genders. Here’s the catch – the proper paperwork, vote, amendment, and everything else had to be done in time for each of the additional genders and it wasn’t. That means the “Gender X” bill was rightfully shot down and unsuccessful. For now, the Massachusetts driver’s license will only have two real genders and no made-up fake ones. That’s a good thing because there are only two genders that anyone should recognize.
We all agree that there are only two genders, right? We cannot make up genders and expect everyone to believe that they are real. Just my opinion, but I am certain that most people agree with me.
Knowing that his liberal colleagues couldn’t rule any of the genders out of order without undermining the logic of transgender ideology, Lyons introduced each as a separate amendment to the bill the evening of July 31, each requiring 10 minutes of debate and three minutes to vote on.
“Number 6 added as a gender ‘cis.’ Amendment 9 — cis female, 13 — cis woman, 14 — cisgender female, 18 — cisgender woman,” Carr details. “Amendment 21 — gender fluid, 22 gender non-conforming, 23 gender questioning, 25 gender variant, 26 genderqueer.”
Six hours in, Lyons had only filed 35 of the amendments, at which point House leadership realized he was running out the clock and there wasn’t enough time before the midnight deadline to pass both the bill and the other legislation on the docket. At 10:45 p.m., they withdrew the bill.
When it comes to making up genders, one can say that most people probably believe that there are only two genders that are real and the rest are fake and should not be recognized by anything official. For example, if a six-foot man gets a driver’s license that states he is either a woman or one of the fake genders, then commits a crime and people are looking for him – then how will he be described? People will say he’s a six-foot man. They aren’t going to say he’s a six-foot man who identifies with a unicorn and has certain pronouns.
The fact that people are picking their own make-believe gender and demanding that others agree to it is nothing less than bullying. If a woman walks into a room dressed like a man and demands that everyone call her a man, then she is fake news and she’s bullying people into believing her false identity. She’s not a man. A man who dresses like a woman is not a woman. It’s really that simple.
The transgender and gender-confused folks can do whatever they want and enjoy themselves, but they should not be forcing their fake news identity upon everyone else.
Just because that guy in a dress believes he’s a woman, that doesn’t mean that I believe he’s a woman.
You know, because he’s not a woman.
Our gender was determined at birth and we can look in our pants when we need a reminder.
Of course, that doesn’t include anyone who surgically modified themselves to become the other gender, even though they are still technically not the other gender.
What happened to just being a strong man and woman? Why do we need 71 extra made up genders?