Did they tell the bad guys to turn in their high capacity magazines? These liberal gun grabbers really have no clue. The quote by one of the City Councilman says it all about liberal logic when it comes to gun rights:

“People who want to defend their families don’t need a 100-round drum magazine and an automatic weapon to do it,” Councilman Paul Krekorian (D.) told the Los Angeles Times.

Trending: “IT WAS A SEA OF RED”…TWO MILE LINE At Trump’s Massive Rally Proves Media’s LIES About Him Are Backfiring! [VIDEO]

Los Angeles banned the possession of gun magazines that hold more than 10 rounds in a unanimous vote Tuesday.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to 100PercentFedUp.com updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The ban goes beyond California state law, which bans the manufacture or sale of those magazines. Instead, within the city of Los Angeles, it will now be a misdemeanor to possess a magazine capable of holding more than 10 rounds. Once the ordinance goes into effect, gun owners who currently have a magazine capable of holding more than 10 rounds will have 60 days to get rid of them before they are in violation of the law.

“People who want to defend their families don’t need a 100-round drum magazine and an automatic weapon to do it,” Councilman Paul Krekorian (D.) told the Los Angeles Times. “Imagine what a gunman on this sidewalk could do with that kind of firepower with a crowd like this.”

Read more: WFB


Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.