Our FBI and DHS Directors have already stated numerous times that it is a big security risk to take in the Syrian refugees…Newsweek didn’t get the memo! It’s interesting to note that the slanted political agenda of left is reflected in the media where they try and convince the sheeple to believe what they say at face value. Of course, you probably haven’t heard that pretty much every security agency in government has warned us NOT to take in refugees. Media like Newsweek makes up its own narrative as you’ll see below:

In the wake of the attacks in Brussels, some U.S. politicians are already calling for a ban of refugees and immigrants from countries in which the Islamic State militant group (ISIS) controls territory.

Rather than justifying a refugee ban, this latest attack should act as a reminder why the United States should take the lead on welcoming those fleeing ISIS. Accepting refugees is clearly important from a humanitarian standpoint, but it is also good for America’s national security.

take our poll - story continues below

What is your top alternative to Facebook? - FIXED(2)

  • What is your top alternative to Facebook?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to 100PercentFedUp.com updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: MEXICO IS FED UP…Shuts Down Their OWN Border

While there is no evidence that any Syrians were involved in the Brussels attack, we know that the threat from refugees to the United States is entirely overblown. Since 1980, when the U.S. began its modern refugee program, the U.S. has accepted almost 3 million refugees, including hundreds of thousands from the Middle East, and not one has successfully carried out an act of so-called terrorism in the United States.

Read more: Newsweek


Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.