Mark Levin just let it drop that the appointment of Mueller is unconstitutional because of the way he was appointed and everything he’s done to expand the investigation:
Fox News reports:
Levin said the attorneys in the case before an Alexandria, Va. federal judge are simultaneously considered “Special Assistant U.S. Attorneys.”
He said that therefore, their direct supervisor — Mueller — should be lawfully considered a “roving” U.S. Attorney.
He said the Constitution designates the president as the person who must nominate all “principal officers” — including U.S. attorneys and cabinet members.
Trending: BREAKING: Name of Judge Presiding Over Trump Case is Revealed… Here’s What Trump Had to Say About Him
But, Mueller was appointed by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and was not confirmed by the Senate, as anyone working as a U.S. attorney should be by law, according to Levin.
Levin said that the scenario therefore “violates the Constitution [via] the Appointments Clause” in Article II.
“Rosenstein usurped the authority of the president of the United States to nominate whoever he wants as a prosecutor,” Levin said.
“Mr. Mueller is serving unconstitutionally in violation of the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution because of the way Rod Rosenstein appointed him.”