Michigan’s Democratic nominee for the U.S. Senate is facing a firestorm after invoking Jesus to defend the political agenda that has earned him the label “radical.”

Abdul El-Sayed made the remarks during a May appearance on The Progressive Christians Podcast, but the exchange exploded across social media this week as the November race began taking shape.

The clip is short. The implications are not.

After the hosts compared left-wing policies with the teachings of Jesus and asked why those positions are called radical, El-Sayed answered that Jesus “was considered radical in his time too.”

Watch the exchange:

The careful description matters here.

ADVERTISEMENT

El-Sayed did not literally declare, “I am Jesus.” The podcast hosts first placed his policies alongside the Sermon on the Mount, and he responded by drawing a parallel between the “radical” label applied to Jesus and the same label applied to his own politics.

That context makes the statement more precise. It does not make it less political.

The Progressive Christians Podcast published the full interview on May 29. The exchange began with the hosts naming Medicare for All, anti-war politics and opposition to corporate influence as positions they viewed as similar to Christian teachings.

They then asked El-Sayed why those positions were treated as radical. He answered by invoking Jesus, adding that there is a radical quality to standing firm “in a time of corruption.”

Earlier in the same discussion, El-Sayed described how his Muslim faith informs his public life. He cited the Quranic principle that there is no compulsion in religion and argued that government should protect people’s freedom to decide how they live, pray and love.

The interview therefore was not a random theological aside. El-Sayed used religious language to frame an explicitly political program and to answer critics who call that program extreme.

And it was not a one-time line.

In a separate August interview, El-Sayed again reached for the teachings of Jesus while making the case for his campaign and attacking Republican opponent Mike Rogers.

Fox News Politics summarized the second exchange this way:

ADVERTISEMENT

In that longer clip, El-Sayed argued that Jesus’ “essential teaching” concerned upending systems used by the rich and powerful to subjugate others.

That is a sweeping political interpretation of Christianity — and one that many Christians will reject.

Jesus spoke relentlessly about sin, repentance, mercy, sacrifice and the Kingdom of God.

Reducing that message to a campaign brief for government-run health care, wealth redistribution and a particular slate of progressive policies is not neutral theology. It is partisan appropriation.

Fox News Politics reported that El-Sayed is now Michigan’s Democratic Senate nominee after defeating establishment-backed Rep. Haley Stevens in the primary.

The reporting also documented the Republican response. The National Republican Senatorial Committee accused El-Sayed of comparing himself to Jesus and argued that his record and policy agenda place him far outside Michigan’s political mainstream.

The stakes go well beyond an argument over one podcast clip. El-Sayed is facing former Republican Rep. Mike Rogers in a race that could help determine control of the U.S. Senate.

The controversy is already becoming part of that larger fight:

CNN called El-Sayed’s August 4 primary victory a triumph for national progressive leaders. He defeated Stevens in the marquee Democratic contest and emerged as the party’s standard-bearer for the open Senate seat.

ADVERTISEMENT

That victory transformed comments once confined to friendly podcasts into general-election material. Every theological claim, policy promise and attack on Rogers now carries statewide consequences.

The seat is open because Democratic Sen. Gary Peters is retiring. CNN described Michigan as a state Democrats almost certainly must hold if they hope to win control of the Senate, and confirmed El-Sayed will face former Republican Rep. Mike Rogers in November.

The primary itself became a test of the Democratic Party’s direction. El-Sayed’s win gave the progressive wing a major victory over a sitting member of Congress backed by more traditional party forces.

Republicans see an opening: define El-Sayed before he can repackage his agenda as ordinary economic populism.

El-Sayed’s campaign openly identifies Medicare for All, getting money out of politics and putting money in voters’ pockets as its central priorities.

The campaign also promotes higher taxes on billionaire wealth, government action on housing and education, and what it calls a “sensible foreign policy.” El-Sayed presents that package as a direct challenge to wealthy interests and a political system he says has failed working people.

Voters can debate those policies on their merits. But they should also recognize what El-Sayed is doing rhetorically: he is wrapping a modern socialist agenda in the moral authority of Jesus and using that authority to answer the charge that his politics are radical.

That is why the backlash is not going away.

The question is no longer whether the clip will follow El-Sayed into the general election.

ADVERTISEMENT

It is how many Michigan voters will believe the comparison helps his case.

This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

 

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.