Remember when the Democratic candidates for president in 2020 all raised their hands to vouch that they believe illegal entry into America should be decriminalized? Well, that open borders policy is spelling trouble for them.
A shocking new report from a liberal think tank is predicting that Americans will vote for laws and NOT unlawful entry into the US. If the Democrats want to win in 2020, they need to start lying again to the American people and pretend they aren’t for open borders.
Yahoo News just reported that a new study from an influential liberal think tank, provided to The Daily Beast, posits that the party’s decision to cede the “rule of law” ground to Republicans creates “the false dichotomy of America as either a nation of immigrants or a nation of laws”—making the party and its candidates appear soft on enforcement, and potentially weakening future attempts for humanitarian-focused immigration reform.
In doing so, writes Tom Jawetz, vice president of immigration policy at the Center for American Progress, supporters of humane immigration policy “have ceded powerful rhetorical ground to immigration restrictionists, who are happy to masquerade as the sole defenders of America as a nation of laws.” H/T Gateway Pundit
Dem pundits are sounding the alarm, but will the far left listen?
SCOOP — the Democratic Party’s top think tank has authored a major immigration memo warning the party and the 2020 candidates that they are losing the messaging war to Trump https://t.co/5bjGYbhkoy
— Sam Stein (@samstein) July 22, 2019
The Democratic party has swung so far left that they are pandering to people who aren’t even citizens of this country!
This all comes down to open borders vs. having a sovereign nation. Which will Americans vote for in 2020?
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez expressed her desire for open borders during a panel discussion. Her comments might sound too far left, but this is exactly what Democrats want. It’s why they are sitting on their hands instead of working to change immigration loopholes.
“I think, uh, migration to me is liberation…”
“It’s the ability to move and be.”
“It’s the freedom to be, really, is what we’re talking about…and I think that all people should be free to be here and in our communities.. because I think that when you start viewing human beings as intrinsically valuable you feel blessed that they have come to you with their presence and that’s I think the shift we need to come to as a country…”
Ocasio-Cortez on immigration: “I think that all people should be free, to be, here and in our communities” pic.twitter.com/GJIg3ihvMK
— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) July 22, 2019
JUST LISTEN TO JOE BIDEN: ” I respect no borders…and cannot be contained by any walls.”
Joe Biden is the gift that keeps on giving to President Trump.
The gaffe master was speaking about globalism and how great it is when he said, ” I respect no borders…and cannot be contained by any walls.”
Does he realize he just offended every man who defended our borders in World War 2?
We believe Joe because he said in 2015 he wants an unrelenting stream of immigration:
In February of 2015, Joe Biden opened his mouth and spilled the beans, telling exactly what the Democrats have planned for Americans.
Please listen to what Biden said in 2015 and then what Sue Payne revealed about Obama’s plan for a “New America”.
This plan puts Americans last and the third world they’ve been importing first. It’s a plan to redistribute wealth by importing poor migrants via immigration or refugee resettlement. The globalist agenda…
These initial “new Americans” are to be used as “seedlings” in the construction of a “country within a country.
Yes, Joe Biden wants an “unrelenting stream of immigration” that will make “Caucasians like me” the minority. And that’s a “good thing” (February 2015)
TASK FORCE ON NEW AMERICANS FOR A NEW AMERICA: How Obama’s administration weaponized illegal aliens and refugees
Journalist and radio host Sue Payne reveals to Mark Levin what we’ve been saying about what’s happening to small towns all across America. Ms. Payne was lucky enough to be privy to a plan for building a ‘country within a country’ using illegals and refugees. This is terrible for America and is a serious blow to our economy, jobs, and way of life. Please listen to Sue Payne and read the bullet points below. Google “Welcoming America” and check to see if they’re in your town, then you’ll know if your town is a target. Yes, this is the fundamental transformation Obama was talking about.
Sue Payne was privy to listening-in on multiple conference calls between Barack Obama and 16 members of his cabinet. What she uncovered was shocking and disturbing.
The administration’s weaponization of illegal aliens and refugees may be far more sinister than even the most ardent opponents have yet imagined.
On one of these calls, Obama conducted a meeting with his new ‘Task Force On New Americans,’ chaired by radical Cecilia Munoz, former vice president of the radical, Hispanic race-supremacy group La Raza (‘The Race’).
MARK LEVIN INTERVIEWS SUE PAYNE:
“Remember when he (Obama) went to Las Vegas? The media said he was signing an executive order for five million illegal aliens to become deferred. In reality, what he did was sign a memorandum that created the ‘Task Force On New Americans,’ which was going to implement his ‘amnesty mill’ for the five million illegals – which I believe is going to be more than that… On these conference calls, it became clear that he’s looking at 13 to 15 million to give protection and move them on to citizenship.” – Payne
These initial “new Americans” are to be used as “seedlings” in the construction of a “country within a country,” which would help complete a full ‘fundamental transformation’ of the United States.
Specific cities are being designated as “receiving communities” (sanctuary cities – we now have 300!) to which illegals are being bused and flown at the expense of American taxpayers. These communities are being used as incubators for an entirely new population that assist in bringing ‘people in the shadows’ into the light – to essentially conquer proper citizens and push them into the underclasses over time.
SHELBYVILLE IS A “RECEIVING COMMUNITY”
Cabinet members discussed the importance of designating upon these illegals ‘refugee status,’ and to then make them aware of their ‘rights’ as they pertain to massive income tax credits (to the tune of $35,000 in some cases), free medical care, free in-state tuition, 0% personal loans, credit cards, and other forms of ‘free cash’ – all at taxpayer expense.
Additionally, there was an emphasis placed on the importance of waves of older illegal immigrants “aging successfully” by being immediately slip-streamed into the Social Security program that the Congressional Budget Office has already warned will be completely exhausted by 2030. This is, of course, despite the fact that they would be illegally and undeservedly sucking dry the mandatory lifetime contributions of American workers.
It was also made clear that this ‘protected class’ of illegal aliens from South and Central America, Mexico, Haiti, Syria, Africa, and the Middle East would not be interested in – nor expected to be – integrating, but to instead “navigate” their way through our society and culture until theirs’ dominate. Read more: wfp
On November 21, 2014, the Task Force on New Americans was formed. Task Force began meeting until Jan – Feb 2015, when a series of three (3) listening sessions were conducted to gather information for the preparation of a report due to the president by March 2015.
During the three listening sessions, it was disclosed that representatives of the White House and all cabinet members, as well as immigrant groups, would share information to be included in the report.
Some of the information exchanged was:
Immigrants should be viewed as seedlings to be planted in fertile soil to grow. The fertile soil was equated to the “receiving communities,” which would be those communities the illegal aliens are now living in, but once out of the shadows, these communities become welcoming or receiving communities.
Others commented that these same communities would be viewed as “emergent immigrant communities.”
As a listener on the call, it was easy to logically see how these communities would welcome immigrants out of the shadows, but also, it could be construed that the host community members might well be relegated into the shadows. In essence, the seedlings consume the host, and what was once the original community is transformed.
One comment cautioned against assuming these “New Americans” would want to assimilate. The interest was in navigation, not assimilation, and the navigation was through the system, focused on benefits.
Another commented that not all the New Americans would want work permits; rather many of the immigrant women wanted to be home with their children and not work, provided taxpayer benefits are secured for them and their children.
*Another suggestion indicated that the Task Force consider these New Americans as refugees or asylum seekers, and as such considered for cash, medical, educational, and housing benefits.
*Testimony by John Conyers reveals that the effort to rename and therefore reclassify illegals as refugees is happening: