The liberal rags have sunken to a new low with the latest cover at New Yorker Magazine (see below). They’ve been beating up on President Trump since the beginning but this is hateful in a new way.

It’s sad to say that the liberal media are all trying to outdo each other with their disrespectful portrayals of POTUS. Can you imagine if the show was on the other foot? Can you imagine if this was Hillary Clinton or Obama? The left would be burning down the NY mag’s building.

From the beginning of Trump’s presidency, it’s been parody after parody. Who can forget Newsweek’s LazyBoy depiction of POTUS?

take our poll - story continues below

Should Jim Acosta have gotten his press pass back?

  • Should Jim Acosta have gotten his press pass back?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to 100PercentFedUp.com updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: JUST IN: FED JUDGE DISMISSES CHARGES Against Several MI Muslim Doctors For Female Genital Mutilation

It seems the tide is turning on the bashing of Trump. People from both sides of the political spectrum came out to bash NY Mag for their distasteful and hateful cover:

Fox News reports:

“I dislike Trump, but they could have done without the body shaming,” one user tweeted. “Especially considering that is a culture we are all trying to get away from.”

The reader added, “As someone who is VERY Anti-Trump, displaying him as a flesh colored blob is 100% body shaming.”

“Shame on you for doing this to anybody, not just the president,” a reader replied to the magazine’s tweet. Another reader was so disgusted that they referred to The New Yorker as “trash” that has “fallen to the lowest level,” while another proclaimed, “Your readers are snobs.”

Conservative commentator Britt McHenry told Fox News that the cover is another sign of “intolerance and mean spirited behavior” from the liberal media.

“Why is his weight relevant? There has been a lot of turbulence within the White House Administration the past couple weeks with high profile people resigning,” McHenry said. “Focus on what actually matters, if criticism is all the media wants to project.”

“MADAME HILLARY”

“Imagine the s–t storm had Madame HillaryClinton won and a magazine had decided to run a cover of her along these lines,” one user wrote.

“It’s sad to see liberal deep state minds at work, only hurting the future of our country, it citizens and their own families! What goes around comes around,” a critic of the cover tweeted, while another said the image is an example of why The New Yorker is “turning into the Mad Magazine for urban elitists.”

Please feel free to go to Facebook and comment on this disgusting portrayal of POTUS:

An early look at next week's cover, “Exposed,” by Barry Blitt: “I wanted to address President Trump’s stormy relationship with the press,” he said. http://nyer.cm/bOqphyg

Posted by The New Yorker on Friday, March 16, 2018

The Barry Blitt illustration “recalls the prophet Bob Dylan, who once noted, in ‘It’s Alright Ma (I’m Only Bleeding),’ that ‘even the President of the United States must sometimes have to stand naked,’” according to the magazine.

BARRY BLITT SHOULD HEAR FROM THE SILENT MAJORITY: NY MAG’S FACEBOOK PAGE

 

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.