President Trump is asking Congress to turn a central part of his border agenda into federal law, with the stated goal of making it harder for a future president to reverse course through executive action alone.
During the Republican Midterm Convention in Dallas on Wednesday night, Trump called for passage of legislation he named the “No Invasion of Our Country Act.”
The president described the proposal in sweeping terms, saying it would prevent a future administration from reopening the border by simply changing executive policy.
Here is Trump making the announcement:
Trump’s wording was sweeping. The immediate legislative mechanism is more precise: move major border-enforcement rules out of executive directives and into a statute passed by Congress.
That distinction matters because executive policies are especially vulnerable when the White House changes hands. A later Congress could amend or repeal a statute, but a president acting alone would face the law enacted by Congress.
The New York Post reported that Trump unveiled the proposal at the American Airlines Center in Dallas as Republicans gathered ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.
The report said Trump framed the measure as a response to the rapid immigration-policy reversals that followed his first term. The Biden administration rescinded or changed several Trump-era directives in 2021, and Trump reversed course again after returning to office in January 2025.
The proposed law is intended to reduce that policy whiplash by putting at least some enforcement requirements into federal statute. The House Freedom Caucus statement released Thursday did not include the full legislative text or a bill number.
That means the most important details are still ahead: which border authorities would be mandatory, what discretion would remain with the executive branch, and how the proposal would address asylum, parole, detention and removal policy.
Republican lawmakers say the bill is already being prepared:
.@RepChipRoy has the bill to codify President Trump’s border policies.
Let’s get it passed! https://t.co/QdidTwjY9e pic.twitter.com/g0zK1asJt6
— House Freedom Caucus (@freedomcaucus) September 10, 2026
The House Freedom Caucus said Rep. Chip Roy of Texas “has the bill” that would codify Trump’s border policies, signaling that the proposal is moving toward legislative form.
The Freedom Caucus post did not cite a House bill number or committee referral. Those formal steps will make it possible to evaluate the measure’s exact language rather than only the president’s description of its goal.
The proposal also arrives in a Congress where immigration legislation has repeatedly proved difficult to move. Even when one party controls both chambers, disputes over enforcement authority, asylum rules, legal immigration and funding can complicate the path from announcement to enactment.
The Congressional Research Service explains that incoming presidents commonly revoke or amend executive orders issued by their predecessors. Its review of presidential transitions documents multiple examples of executive policy changing quickly when control of the White House shifts.
That history helps explain the administration’s push for legislation. An executive order can direct agencies within existing law, but it does not carry the same durability as a statute enacted by Congress.
A future Congress could still amend or repeal a border law, and courts could be asked to decide disputes over its meaning or constitutionality. But a future president generally could not erase a clear statutory command merely by issuing a contrary executive order.
A second video angle captured the key line from the Dallas speech:
Trump: “We will pass a No Invasion Of Our Country Act” pic.twitter.com/xHDYFoiJWo
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) September 10, 2026
Trump’s stated objective is to make his second-term border policies more difficult for a future administration to unwind through executive action alone.
The legislative substance is not yet clear. Until the bill text is released, claims about exactly what the measure would require, forbid or withstand in court remain premature.
What is now on the record is the president’s request, the proposal’s name and a public statement from the House Freedom Caucus tying Rep. Roy to the bill.
The next test is whether Republicans introduce specific language—and whether they can assemble the votes to send it to Trump’s desk.
Featured image: President Donald Trump and Speaker Mike Johnson following a House Republican Conference meeting on March 9, 2026. Office of Speaker Mike Johnson, public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.
This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.






