The one way that the gun grabbers can succeed is by using the courts. A great example from SCOTUS today is a huge blow to the firearms industry:

The Jerusalem Post is reporting that the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday dealt a blow to the firearms industry, rejecting Remington Arms Co’s bid to escape a lawsuit by families of victims aiming to hold the gun maker liable for its marketing of the assault-style rifle used in the 2012 Sandy Hook school massacre.

Were emotions stirred by Sandy Hook parents who attended the court hearing today carrying photos of their deceased children? As horrible as this case is, it is Adam Lanza who is responsible for this massacre and NOT the gun manufacturer.

This will probably put Remington out of operation and sound a warning to other gun manufacturers who are in no way responsible for a mass shooting like Sandy Hook.

The heart of this issue is the fact that Adam Lanza wasn’t the owner of the firearms used at Sandy Hook, and thus not the intended target of marketing. He stole the guns from his mother who was the legal owner and killed her.

The justices turned away Remington’s appeal of a ruling by Connecticut’s top court to let the lawsuit proceed despite a federal law that broadly shields firearms manufacturers from liability when their weapons are used in crimes.

Trending: Watch: Sick 2006 Video Reveals Why “Snarky, Jewish, Bisexual” Pamela Karlan Attacked 13-Yr-Old Barron Trump

Family members of the Sandy Hook shooting victims say ads like the one above motivated Adam Lanza to use a powerful weapon.

This opens up every gun manufacturer to be sued for EVERY murder!

2,128SHARES

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.