Last week, the far-left TIME publication named teen climate actor, Greta Thunberg, their “Person of the Year.” Their decision left many people scratching their heads, wondering what the teenager from Sweden has actually done to deserve so much recognition from the media while overlooking young women like Morgan Vague, who actually made a scientific discovery last year that could be one of the most significant contributions to our planet in recent history.
In July 2018, The Independent reported about Morgan Vague, a biology student at Reed College in Oregon, who may have found a solution to one of the most urgent environmental crises in the world. She discovered a breeding bacteria that can “eat” plastic and break it down into by-products that are harmless.
One of the most common plastics is PET or polyethylene terephthalate. It is used in bottles, clothing, and food packaging. This type of plastic takes hundreds of years to break down, and it causes damage to the environment. According to Vague, “Humans produce 300 million tons of new plastic each year — yet, despite our best efforts, less than 10 percent of it ends up being recycled. Is there a better way to deal with all this waste?”
In the video below, Vague describes her research with microbiologist Jay Mellies on bacteria that have evolved the unexpected ability to eat plastic — and how they could help us solve our growing pollution problem.
Unlike teen climate actress, Greta Thunberg, Morgan Vague is actually making a contribution to saving our earth. Greta Thunberg, who achieved worldwide fame when she blasted onto the world stage in September 2019.
“You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words, and yet I’m one of the lucky ones.” The angry 16-year-old climate kid, Greta Thunberg ranted in a room filled with world leaders at the UN Climate Summit in New York City.
Thunberg, who looked a typical child actor trying out for a role in an upcoming movie, admonished some of the most powerful people in the world with unfounded accusations and allegations, “People are suffering, people are dying. Entire ecosystems are collapsing. We are in the beginning of a mass extinction, and all you can talk about is money and fairytales of eternal economic growth. How dare you!?”
One America News Network host Liz Wheeler blasted Thunberg’s parents and liberal activists who have used her as pawns in their sick scheme to convince the world that we need to dump trillions of dollars into the hands of government officials to fix th3e weather, or the world will come to an end.
In February, thousands of students in the UK skipped school to take part in a climate strike like the one that made Greta Thunberg famous. Students climbed historic monuments, held signs that were pre-printed by the Socialist Worker organization, and were arrested for blocking traffic as they sat in the middle of the road, while traffic moved around them.
These climate strikes are not grassroots efforts by kids; they are funded and organized by radical far-left groups who are more than happy to allow kids to fight their battles. According to Newsbusters – The ongoing, youth-led global climate strikes which took place again on Sept. 20, partnered with several organizations connected to liberal billionaires George Soros, 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Tom Steyer, and media mogul and former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg.
The theatrical, climate alarmist Greta Thunberg, comes from a long line of dramatic actors. Her mother, Malena Ernmanhe, is a Swedish opera singer.
Thunberg’s father, Svante Thunberg, is an actor.
Her grandfather, Olof Thunberg, is also an actor and director.
President Trump took a subtle jab at the doomsday climate kid, regarding her temperament during her performance in front of the world leaders. “She seems like a very happy young girl looking forward to a bright and wonderful future.”
It’s not the first time the left has used a child actor to push their radical, far-left agenda.
In 2016, Hillary Clinton used a teenage girl actress 15-year-old Brennan Leach to stage a question designed to trash Trump at her Haverford, PA Townhall. What kind of woman would be okay with a young girl lying in front of an entire crowd of people for the sole purpose of making herself look good? Guess what Hillary? Asking young teenage girls to lie for you doesn’t look so good…
The owner of Youtube Spanglevision did some amazing investigative work to prove his case. From his Youtube video: Hillary has no shame; she used the 15-year-old child actor to further her anti-Trump narrative. What kind of role model is Hillary for women teaching teenage girls that cheating is an acceptable form of winning?
Brennan’s father is Daylin Leach a left-wing member of the PA House, who happened to mention how offended he was by Trump’s alleged “fat pig” comment in his Facebook post below.
Here is the text from his Facebook post. The original post can be found below:
BERNIE vs. HILLARY manifesto
I have tried to largely avoid posting on Bernie vs. Hillary. Donald Trump provides me with more than enough material to keep me busy. But I feel the need say a few things
First, full disclosure, I am a Hillary delegate. I like Hillary. I agree with Bernie more on a couple of issues, but generally speaking, they are both progressive enough. And I don’t always support the most progressive candidate for President. I support the most progressive candidate WHO CAN WIN. I didn’t support Jesse Jackson, Dennis Kucinich, Ralph Nader, Al Sharpton, etc., because they were all unelectable.
I’ve always found Bernie unelectable. Current polls are meaningless. Nobody has ever run a negative ad against Bernie. Once the Republicans spend a billion dollars, he will look like the love child of Che Guevara and Julius Rosenberg. But hey, you may disagree with me. Fine. My point is not to convince anyone to vote for Hillary in the primary.
The fall, however, is a different story. I have seen too many liberals say that Hillary is imperfect, and she is not progressive enough on some issue or other, or she takes corporate money (like Obama, Kerry, Gore, etc. did) or that they don’t like her, and thus they are not voting for her. They will write in Bernie, or vote for the Tofu Party, or whatever. I feel compelled to say that for a progressive, that is simply immoral and insane.
Clinton’s rating from progressive organizations while in the Senate was virtually identical to Sanders. She may not call for raising the minimum wage to $15 (which is my bill in PA) but to $12. She may want to expand Obamacare rather than establish single-payer. But these are all steps in a progressive direction.
But even more importantly, Clinton is not running against Franklin Roosevelt in the fall. She is running against an outright racist, xenophobic authoritarian, who promises to bring back torture, feels workers “make too much” is anti-choice, calls women “fat pigs” promises to “bomb the shit out of” whole bunches of people and ban entire religions from our nation.
Wait, I’m not done. He will appoint an extreme right-wing Supreme Court that will persist for decades. He is anti-union, wants to eliminate “the Department of Environmental” thinks climate change is a “hoax invented by China”. He is a birther and a conspiracy theorist generally.
He knows nothing about any issue other than he will solve it with something ‘beautiful, huge and tremendous which everyone will love, believe me”. He tells people at his rallies to “beat the crap out of” protesters, and he wants to curtail freedom of the press so he can sue reporters who write bad stories about him.
So when someone says they “won’t vote for the lesser of two evils”, that is just lazy and sloppy thinking. There is no parity of evil. There is impure and maybe off-putting versus true, crypto fascist evil. It’s like if someone threatened to cut off your toe or your entire leg. Would you say “I’m not going to choose, because I don’t like either option”?
The thing is, this isn’t some academic exercise where we can be self-righteously pure. This will affect people’s lives directly.
So again, it is simply immoral and insane for progressives to pretend that who wins in November doesn’t matter. Think of it this way. Lets say on a scale of 1-100 measuring how progressive a candidate is, Bernie is a 90. And let’s say Hillary is only a 70 (not fair, but lets just say). Trump is about a 2. So if you are really progressive. You vote for 70 over 2. You don’t sit it out because you can’t have 90.
This why its not only important to work for Hillary in the fall, but maybe to stop attacking her once she has mathematically clinched the nomination. Because, in the end, it really, really matters.