MS NOW found itself staring straight at the legal weight of a federal search warrant Monday morning.

Federal agents searched Rep. Ilhan Omar’s Washington-area home Monday morning as part of an ongoing criminal investigation tied to questions about immigration paperwork.

And while the network’s panel worked overtime to frame the search as another political attack by President Trump, MS NOW justice and intelligence reporter Ken Dilanian had to acknowledge one stubborn fact: federal agents do not get to rummage through a sitting member of Congress’s home just because somebody in Washington feels like it.

A judge had to sign off on it.

 

The Associated Press reported that Homeland Security Investigations agents executed the search at Omar’s home three weeks before the midterm elections. The Justice Department confirmed that the warrant was judicially authorized and connected to an ongoing federal criminal investigation.

ADVERTISEMENT

Officials did not publicly disclose the affidavit or spell out the precise allegations. Omar has denied wrongdoing and has not been charged with a crime.

The timing immediately became part of the fight. Omar is seeking reelection next month, and Democratic congressional leaders questioned why the Justice Department approved such a public investigative step so close to the midterms.

That last point matters. The warrant establishes probable cause for the search without deciding whether Omar committed an offense.

The legal threshold is still serious.

Dilanian told viewers that securing a warrant for a home is a major step. A judge must find probable cause to believe evidence of a crime is located at the place agents want to search.

In this case, that place was Omar’s residence.

That is the legal reality MS NOW could not talk around, no matter how many times the panel reached for the words “right-wing circles.”

The full MS NOW transcript shows Dilanian saying the investigation reportedly concerns immigration paperwork completed when Omar was a child. The questions, he said, involve her immigration history, her legal status, and whether the paperwork filed when her family arrived as refugees was proper.

Dilanian said the warrant affidavit is likely sealed under standard procedure, leaving the public without the facts investigators presented to the court. He stressed that the warrant did not settle the case, while acknowledging agents had shown a judge enough to secure authority for the search.

ADVERTISEMENT

During a later segment, Dilanian returned to the same legal threshold. DHS had to present evidence suggesting that evidence of a crime was inside Omar’s Washington-area home, or at least establish probable cause to believe it was there.

That is a much more serious development than another round of cable-news speculation.

Axios said federal agents conducted the pre-dawn search as part of an immigration probe. The outlet noted that Border Czar Tom Homan confirmed last month that a criminal investigation was underway, though he declined to disclose its details.

Omar answered the search by accusing the administration of targeting political enemies and weaponizing federal law enforcement. She said President Trump had spent years directing attacks and accusations at her, and she vowed that the search would not silence her.

Her House office called the operation political intimidation and said Omar’s family was safe. The Justice Department, meanwhile, limited its public statement to the existence of the warrant and the ongoing federal criminal investigation.

Those accusations deserve scrutiny. So does the evidence presented to the judge.

But the obvious question remains: if this was all merely an old internet rumor, what did federal investigators put before the court to obtain a warrant for a congresswoman’s home?

MS NOW does not know, and neither do we. The affidavit has not been made public.

Still, the network’s own reporter conceded the central point. Agents needed more than a press clipping and a political grudge.

ADVERTISEMENT

They needed a factual showing strong enough for a judge to authorize an extraordinarily intrusive search.

Now the country waits to learn what that showing was, what agents seized, and whether prosecutors believe the evidence supports charges.

For all the panel’s talk about politics, that is the story sitting in the middle of the room.

This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

 

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.