Has-Been-Hillary, who appears to be gearing up for a rematch with President Trump in 2024, spoke with low-ratings Mika of MSNBC’s Morning Joe. Crooked Hillary, who’s never at a loss of words when asked about the man who pummeled her in the 2020 presidential election, attempted to paint President Trump as a supporter of Putin.
“We have to also make sure within our own country that we are calling out those people who are giving aid and comfort to Putin,” she said as she attempted to falsely tie Trump (what’s new) to Russia.
We have to make sure that within our own country, we are calling out people giving aid and comfort to Putin and siding with autocrats against the global cause of democracy. pic.twitter.com/6R11vmtkKP
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) February 28, 2022
Although there is absolutely no evidence of ties to Trump and Putin, Uranium One Hillary and her serial sexually-assaulter husband have a LOT of explaining to do when it comes to ties to the Russian thug.
In November 2017, we reported about the Hillary Clinton Uranium One scandal that appeared to tie the Democrat Party two-time presidential loser to Russia:
An FBI informant connected to the Uranium One controversy told three congressional committees in a written statement that Moscow routed millions of dollars to America with the expectation it would be used to benefit Bill Clinton’s charitable efforts while Secretary of State Hillary Clinton quarterbacked a “reset” in US-Russian relations.
The informant, Douglas Campbell, said in the statement obtained by The Hill that he was told by Russian nuclear executives that Moscow had hired the American lobbying firm APCO Worldwide specifically because it was in a position to influence the Obama administration, and more specifically, Hillary Clinton.
Campbell said Russian nuclear officials “told me at various times that they expected APCO to apply a portion of the $3 million annual lobbying fee it was receiving from the Russians to provide in-kind support for the Clinton’s Global Initiative,” he added in the testimony.
From Fox News – Douglas Campbell, the former FBI contractor-turned-whistleblower who supplied documents related to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Uranium One controversy, is blasting the FBI over a mysterious raid on his home last month.
Questioning whether “we now live in a secret police state,” Dennis Nathan Cain took his frustration to Twitter on the heels of a report that the Justice Department is trying to keep the justification for the raid secret.
Watch Fox News’ Sean Hannity dig deep into the “real Russian collusion” with Hillary Clinton:
“So I blow the whistle on the FBI, get raided by the same FBI, and now they want to keep the FBI’s reasons secret? Do we now live in a secret police state? Feels a little like 1984,” Cain tweeted late Monday, citing The Daily Caller report.
Since we all now know that Hillary’s campaign was behind the big lie about Trump’s collusion with Russia, and they were actually spying on President Trump after he was the duly-elected President of the United States, it’s absolutely laughable that Nick Merrill, a spokesman for Clinton, said Campbell’s testimony was simply being used to distract from the investigations into President Trump and Russia.
In 2017, the Daily Mail also reported about the scandal-ridden Democratic power couple and their dirty dealings with Russia that put our national security at risk.
When former President Bill Clinton received a $500,000 check from a Kremlin-linked bank in 2010 to give a speech in Moscow, it served, to the FBI, as further evidence the Russians had unleashed an influence campaign designed to get access to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
The Hill newspaper reported Sunday night that the FBI had been keeping close tabs on a Russian spy network that was trying to inch closer to the Clintons at the dawn of the Obama administration, with one spy – who was eventually arrested and deported – briefly posing successfully as an American accountant and working for a top Democratic donor.
FBI agents were ‘surprised by the timing and size,’ the Hill wrote, of Bill Clinton’s half-million-dollar speech, which has raised conflict-of-interest questions about Hillary Clinton, as the transaction occurred around the same time she was being asked to sign off on a uranium deal, which gave Russia 20 percent of the U.S.’s deposits.
‘There is not one shred of doubt from the evidence that we had that the Russians had set their sights on Hillary Clinton’s circle, because she was the quarterback of the Obama-Russian reset strategy and the assumed successor to Obama as president,’ a source who knew of the FBI’s evidence told the Hill.
The most criminal effort came from a Russian spy named Cynthia Murphy, who was pretending to be an accountant in New Jersey.
Murphy was one of a handful of Russian spies unmasked in 2010, alongside model Anna Chapman.
In 2012, ABC News reported that what triggered the FBI to round up and oust the spies was that one had gotten too close to a sitting U.S. cabinet official.
While fingers had initially pointed at Chapman, ABC reported it was Murphy who was the problem, as she had been in contact with a ‘personal friend’ of Hillary Clinton, identified as fundraiser Alan Patricof.
Conversations between Clinton’s deputy chief of staff, Huma Abedin, and State Department Dennis Cheng show that Patricof wanted to give Clinton a heads up as the story was about to become public, emails released through Citizens United show.
However, when the Russian spy ring story broke in 2010, Clinton’s office issued a statement saying there was ‘no reason to think the secretary was a target of this spy ring.’
A day after the ring of Russian spies was arrested, Bill Clinton accepted the $500,000 check, which caught the FBI’s attention, the Hill learned.
Clinton gave a 90-minute speech to Renaissance Capital, a Kremlin-connected bank promoting the Uranium One Deal’s stock.
Fact-Check.org quickly jumped to Hillary’s defense, writing- It may be that individuals and companies sought to curry favor with Hillary Clinton and even influence her department’s decision on the Uranium One sale. But, as we’ve written before, there is no evidence that donations to the Clinton Foundation from people with ties to Uranium One or Bill Clinton’s speaking fee influenced Hillary Clinton’s official actions. That’s still the case. We will update this article with any major developments.