Anti-Trump LTC Alexander Vindman was a star witness in the Democrat impeachment circus.

Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman’s bombshell testimony Tuesday raised significant questions as to what his authority is within the White House National Security Council when he delivered a direct message to the Ukrainian president in April and whether he undermined the White House when he spoke to the foreign leader.

Vindman’s advice to the Ukrainian president was based on his knowledge of an alleged plot being organized by public nongovernmental individuals to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden’s sons dealings with a Ukrainian gas company and the possible involvement of Ukraine in the 2016 presidential elections, he said.

Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) tweeted about how the Democrats are relying on the testimony of LTC Vindman’s testimony, a man who’s never even met with President Trump, to impeach him.

Meadows slammed Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee, saying, “Remarkably using yet another witness who has never met or talked to President Trump,” adding, “They are relying on the witness’ disputed interpretation… of someone he’s never worked directly with.” Meadows called the impeachment circus a “farce.”

During his questioning by Republican Representative Jim Jordan (OH), he was interrupted by House Intelligence Chairman Schiff, who accused Rep. Jordan blasted Schiff of outing the whistleblower. Jordon responded to Schiff, saying, “I don’t see how this is outing the whistleblower. The witness has testified that he does not know who the whistleblower is. You have said, even though no one believes you, you have said you don’t know who the whistleblower is…”

In a tweet last night, Democrat Senator Chuck Schumer also tweeted about LTC Alexander Vindman, but in Senator Schumer’s tweet, he referred to Vindman as a whistleblower.

Why would Senator Schumer refer to LTC Alexander Vindman as a whistleblower—unless of course, he’s a whistleblower? Hmmm…

2,844SHARES

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.