A woman filed a lawsuit against the National Park Service in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia for allegedly refusing to accept cash for an entry fee.

In the lawsuit, Elizabeth Dasburg and two other plaintiffs allege the National Park Service is violating U.S. law by refusing to accept U.S. currency.

The lawsuit stems from Dasburg attempting to enter the Fort Pulaski National Monument in Georgia.

She was told the U.S. National Park Service site could only accept cards for entry.

Dasburg and two other individuals were denied entry into the site unless they used a card.

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) is funding the lawsuit.

“CHD is excited to support attorney Ray Flores and the plaintiffs in this case to push back against the move toward a cashless society and central bank digital currency,” said Kim Mack Rosenberg, CHD general counsel.

“By forcing people to use credit cards or digital wallets, under the guise of convenience, the National Park Service becomes a player in the surveillance state, undermining park visitors’ privacy right,” Rosenberg said, according to CHD.

Further details from The Defender:

Flores told The Defender he found it “appalling” that “these pristine lands are the nation’s testing ground” for a cashless society.

The National Park Service has been implementing and expanding a cashless entry payment system over the past few years, Flores said.

Now, nearly 30 national parks, historic sites and monuments deny entrance to those who try to pay with cash, the complaint said. They accept only credit, debit and other electronic forms of payment, such as ApplePay.

The plaintiffs are asking the court to declare this practice unlawful, which would mean the National Park Service would be forced to let visitors pay with cash. They also seek relief for the cost of the suit, including attorney fees.

Defendants in the case are the National Park Service, the U.S. Department of the Interior — which oversees the National Park Service — and Charles F. Sams III in his official capacity as National Park Service director.

USA Today last year highlighted the National Park System’s gradual push to going cashless and rolling out the digital agenda.

“We are trying to watch where our visitor demand is, but we’re also trying to make smart operational decisions that allow us to keep as many dollars in our parks,” Justin Unger, National Park Service associate director for Business Services, told USA Today.

Death Valley National Park, Rocky Mountain National Park, Hawai’i Volcanoes National Park, and Mount Rainier National Park are among the national parks to go cashless.

Per USA Today:

There are a number of reasons some parks stop accepting cash.

To start, Unger said in recent years the U.S. Treasury created policies to reduce the amount of cash and checks handled across the federal government and many banks stopped partnering with the Treasury in that process.

“The number of formal banks with relationships with the Treasury Department, where we could actually take cash, has really dried up especially in more rural or remote areas,” he said.

Couple that with the ongoing closure of brick and mortar banks, and many parks wind up having to take that cash even further to deposit, costing both time and money. Death Valley spent roughly $40,000 a year on processing and transporting cash, according to the park.

By going cashless, Unger said, “We’re not paying for armored car service. We don’t have to pay for an employee to be able to shuttle cash back and forth or to have our law enforcement officers doing that. Instead they get to focus on doing law enforcement, providing emergency services.”

Unger also discussed the convenience of cashless transactions inside national parks.

“Imagine a tablet and being able, when we have long queued lines, to swipe people’s cards as you walk down the line so that as people are approaching the entrance gate in very busy parks, they can keep moving through the entrance gate as fast as possible, making a better customer experience,” Unger said.

“This lawsuit goes at the very heart of the war to preserve cash, and with it, our human and health freedoms,” Catherine Austin Fitts, former federal housing commissioner at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, told The Defender.

“Removing cash from circulation is an essential step to implementing a complete surveillance state that can shut off our money at will, as we saw happen to the Canadian Truckers, or take our assets and grab our land,” she said.

Read the lawsuit HERE.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.