A 69-year-old Baltimore motorcyclist is dead.

Police say a 12-year-old boy was behind the wheel of the stolen car that hit him after witnesses saw the vehicle move around traffic stopped at a red light.

The accused driver will not face criminal charges.

That last fact is not internet exaggeration. It is the consequence of Maryland law.

The crash happened shortly after 1:40 p.m. on September 30 near North Dukeland Street and West North Avenue in Baltimore.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Baltimore Police Department reported that officers found a collision involving a stolen sedan and a motorcycle. The 69-year-old rider was taken to a hospital in critical condition and later pronounced dead.

Police said two people—a male and a female—got out of the disabled sedan and fled on foot. Investigators later identified the motorcyclist as Baltimore resident Barry Wright.

The department’s Traffic Investigation Unit took control of the case. Its initial public release did not identify either person who ran from the vehicle, announce an arrest, or describe what happened at the traffic light.

That first account established the hard facts before the case exploded online: the sedan was stolen, the motorcycle rider died, and the occupants left the wreck instead of remaining at the scene.

Local video showing the collision and its aftermath triggered an immediate wave of anger:

CBS News Baltimore reported that police identified a 12-year-old boy as the alleged driver of the stolen Kia. A 15-year-old girl who was in the passenger seat was arrested and charged with motor vehicle theft.

Witnesses said the Kia went around a car that had stopped at the light before striking Wright. Police said the car had been reported stolen by a Baltimore County resident one day earlier.

The department did not announce an arrest or delinquency charge against the boy. Instead, it submitted a Child in Need of Supervision referral and met with the Maryland Department of Juvenile Services.

That split—one teenager charged, the younger child referred for supervision—became the center of the story:

ADVERTISEMENT

Maryland generally gives juvenile courts jurisdiction over children accused of delinquent acts beginning at age 13.

There are exceptions for children ages 10 through 12, but they apply to a limited list of serious offenses, including specified crimes of violence, certain firearm offenses, aggravated animal cruelty and third-degree sexual offenses.

The state’s juvenile-jurisdiction statute therefore does not automatically let prosecutors handle every fatal act by a 12-year-old as a delinquency case.

The statute gives juvenile courts original jurisdiction over a child who is at least 13 and is alleged to be delinquent. For children ages 10 through 12, jurisdiction is limited to the listed violent, firearm, animal-cruelty and sexual offenses, along with acts arising from the same incident.

That age line is not a sentencing preference applied after a conviction. It determines whether the court has authority to hear a delinquency case in the first place.

The legal distinction is brutal in practice. A death can be undisputed while the conduct alleged by police still falls outside the categories lawmakers selected for children under 13.

WBAL spoke with Andrew Alperstein, president of the Maryland Criminal Defense Attorneys Association, who explained that vehicular manslaughter is not included among Maryland’s defined “crimes of violence.” Without evidence supporting one of the qualifying offenses, the 12-year-old cannot be charged in juvenile court for the reported conduct.

That does not mean nothing happens. A Child in Need of Supervision case can bring the child and family under court oversight and connect them with services.

But it is not a criminal charge, and it is not a delinquency adjudication for the death of Barry Wright.

ADVERTISEMENT

Alperstein also stressed that the publicly known facts did not establish an intent to kill. That matters because the legal system cannot simply relabel conduct to reach a desired punishment after a terrible result.

Maryland lawmakers anticipated exactly this kind of gap.

The state’s newly effective NyKayla Strawder Memorial Act requires a Child in Need of Supervision petition when a child under 13 is accused of an act resulting in someone’s death. Governor Wes Moore approved the measure in May, and it took effect October 1.

The law guarantees intervention. It does not create criminal liability for a child under 13.

Law enforcement must forward the complaint to the Department of Juvenile Services, and an intake officer must file the supervision petition. The measure passed both chambers unanimously—131-0 in the House and 46-0 in the Senate—before becoming Chapter 635.

That timing is striking. Wright was killed on September 30, one day before the law’s effective date, while police later chose the same supervision route the new statute mandates for fatal cases involving children under 13.

That distinction is why this case has spread so quickly beyond Baltimore:

Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott said the result should be treated differently.

Scott argued that running someone over and killing them with a stolen car should count as a crime of violence. He renewed his call for Maryland lawmakers to change the juvenile justice system.

ADVERTISEMENT

He has a point that cannot be brushed aside with procedural language.

A child’s age matters. Intent matters.

Rehabilitation matters.

Barry Wright’s life matters, too.

A justice system has to be capable of holding all of those truths at once. When a stolen car blows through an intersection, a man dies, and the law cannot even reach a delinquency charge, lawmakers owe the public more than a shrug and a referral.

They owe Wright’s family an honest answer about whether the law is protecting children—or simply refusing to confront what happened.

This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

 

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.