There are stories that make every parent stop cold.

This is one of them.

Families in Ladera Ranch, California, say six children from their community have been diagnosed with Ewing sarcoma, an extraordinarily rare cancer of bone and soft tissue.

One of those children, 17-year-old Brody Matteson, died in March.

No government agency has officially declared a cancer cluster or identified a common cause. But with a cancer this rare, the families’ questions cannot simply be waved away.

ADVERTISEMENT

NBC Los Angeles spoke with Brody’s mother, Megan Matteson, about the teenager her family lost. Her account puts a child and a grieving family behind numbers that can otherwise feel cold and distant.

She described Brody as an outdoor kid who rode his bike, built jumps, and spent time in the parks around Ladera Ranch.

Shortly before his 15th birthday, back pain led to a devastating diagnosis. The tumor was on the L4 vertebra of his spine, in a location his mother said could not be treated with surgery.

After Brody died, Matteson said she began hearing from other local families. The reports did not arrive through an official public notice; parents found one another as they confronted the same terrifying diagnosis.

Five other children in the community had reportedly been diagnosed with Ewing sarcoma. That brought the family-reported total to six.

Matteson said three families contacted her quickly after Brody’s diagnosis. Their support helped, but hearing the same devastating words attached to other children in a community of roughly 20,000 to 30,000 people was frightening.

NBC’s report did not identify all six children or independently publish their medical records. The total comes from Matteson’s account of the families who came forward.

NBC also reported that Orange County health officials conducted an initial review of cancer data and did not find a particular pattern. Because concerns have continued, officials said they plan to review the data again in the coming weeks.

That distinction matters. The concern is real, but the existence of an official cancer cluster has not yet been established.

ADVERTISEMENT

The numbers explain why the reports have shaken this community so deeply.

The American Cancer Society says Ewing sarcoma is a rare tumor that develops in tissue that normally forms bone and soft tissue.

It accounts for only about 1% of childhood cancers. Roughly 200 children and teenagers are diagnosed across the entire United States each year.

Most Ewing tumors develop in teenagers, though the disease can also strike younger children and adults. Younger patients are more likely to develop tumors that begin in bone, while adults are more likely to have tumors outside the bones.

The cancer is also diagnosed more often in males than females. The American Cancer Society notes significant differences in incidence among racial groups, another factor investigators must consider when comparing a local population with national rates.

Those details are why a raw count cannot settle the question by itself. Public-health officials have to compare similar populations and measure the local reports against an appropriate expected rate.

The National Cancer Institute puts the incidence rate at approximately three cases per one million Americans younger than 20, based on federal registry data from 2016 through 2020.

The rate rises with age during childhood, reaching 4.3 cases per million among children ages 10 to 14 and 4.5 per million among teens ages 15 to 19.

NCI says the overall pediatric incidence has remained essentially unchanged from the rate reported between 1973 and 2004. That makes Ewing sarcoma persistently rare, not a disease whose national frequency has recently surged.

ADVERTISEMENT

Those national statistics do not prove that six reported cases in Ladera Ranch form a cluster. They do show why parents are stunned to hear the same diagnosis repeated in one relatively small community.

The families are also asking for more information about pesticides used in shared outdoor spaces.

They have not claimed to know what caused the illnesses. In fact, an attorney working with the families told NBC that correlation is not causation and that they cannot say pesticides are responsible.

That caution is essential. There is currently no established evidence tying a specific landscaping product or community practice to these reported cases.

Still, asking what is being applied around parks, sidewalks, and other common areas is a reasonable question when parents are desperate for answers.

Ladera Ranch’s official pest-management page says its landscaping contractor uses fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides in common areas. It says synthetic materials are sometimes used when practical alternatives are unavailable and that the products are approved for their intended use by the EPA and California Department of Pesticide Regulation.

The HOA says those materials are used to control invasive weeds, turf weeds, tree borers, and grubs that can damage the community’s landscaping.

Its page also says the contractor considers non-synthetic options but sometimes concludes that synthetic products are required to maintain common areas.

That is the association’s public explanation. The families’ request goes further: they want enough information about which products were used, where they were applied, and in what amounts to let investigators evaluate whether any shared exposure deserves scrutiny.

ADVERTISEMENT

That policy is useful context. It is not proof of a cancer connection.

The right next step is not internet speculation. It is a transparent review of verified diagnoses, the affected population, the timeline, and any exposures the children may have shared.

The CDC defines a cancer cluster as a greater-than-expected number of the same or etiologically related cancers among a defined group of people, in a defined place, over a defined period.

That definition requires more than counting cases. Investigators must establish the population at risk, the geographic boundary, the time window, and the expected incidence for a comparable group.

The CDC also warns that an unusual pattern can result from chance, genetics, behavior, social factors, occupational exposure, environmental exposure, or a combination of influences.

Geography and time matter enormously. The agency notes that changing the boundaries of the area being studied can accidentally create or obscure an apparent cluster, while the chosen time period changes both the number of observed cases and the expected rate.

Cancer investigations are also complicated by latency, population movement, and the fact that multiple factors can interact in ways researchers do not fully understand.

That is why a careful investigation can neither begin with a predetermined culprit nor end with a shrug. It has to test the reported pattern against real data and follow the evidence from there.

In other words, public-health officials have serious work to do before anyone can responsibly announce either a cluster or a cause.

Brody’s parents are not asking the public to pretend an answer already exists.

They are asking officials to do the work required to find out whether one does.

Six children in one community facing one of the rarest pediatric cancers is more than enough reason for sunlight, records, and a serious second review.

No panic. No premature verdict.

But no brush-off, either.

These families deserve clarity, and every parent in Ladera Ranch deserves to know that the questions are being pursued wherever the evidence leads.

This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

 

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.