Gavin Newsom just made one of the most sweeping clemency moves in American history.

The California governor is commuting the death sentences of every person on the state’s death row—548 prisoners in all—to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

No one is being released.

But if every commutation is finalized, California’s death row will effectively be emptied in one move.

TMZ first put the stunning number front and center Thursday: all 548 condemned prisoners in California are covered by Newsom’s announcement.

ADVERTISEMENT

That group includes 529 men and 19 women.

The punishment in each case would become life without parole. Newsom also specified that the prisoners will not be eligible for new state commutation and resentencing regulations that could create a path to release.

In other words, they will remain behind bars for the rest of their lives.

They just will not face execution by the state.

The announcement applies across the entire condemned population rather than separating prisoners by crime, age, time served or the status of their appeals. That breadth is what turned a long-running California policy debate into an immediate national story.

Newsom had already prevented executions during his tenure. This action goes further by attempting to replace every current death judgment with a permanent prison sentence that a future governor could not revive by lifting the moratorium.

Newsom defended the decision in a public letter, arguing that state-sanctioned killing is incompatible with California’s values and with an imperfect legal system that can never eliminate the possibility of error.

He also accepted personal responsibility for the move, acknowledging that it could reopen wounds for the families of murder victims.

The legal reality is more complicated than one signature.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Associated Press reported that the California Constitution requires the state Supreme Court to approve clemency for anyone convicted of more than one felony. Newsom’s office says that applies to 382 of the 548 prisoners—roughly 70 percent of the cases—and means the final outcome depends on judicial votes that must be secured before his term ends in January.

That constitutional hurdle prevents the governor from completing most of the conversions alone and leaves hundreds of families waiting through another consequential legal process.

The remaining commutations can take effect through the governor’s direct authority.

For the hundreds that require review, at least four of the seven California Supreme Court justices will have to agree.

The court’s role matters because a mass announcement does not mean every case changed status at the same instant. Roughly 30 percent of the commutations fall within Newsom’s unilateral authority, while the rest must survive individual constitutional review.

The AP also noted the political and historical backdrop: Newsom imposed the execution moratorium in 2019, California has not executed a prisoner in two decades, and the state still houses the largest condemned population in the Western Hemisphere.

Among the prisoners affected are some of California’s most notorious convicted killers, ensuring that the court review and public backlash will focus on individual crimes as much as the governor’s broader argument against capital punishment.

The scale is difficult to overstate.

The Death Penalty Information Center called it the largest mass clemency action in American history. If every case is approved, the change would reduce the nation’s death-row population by nearly 30 percent.

ADVERTISEMENT

California has the largest death-row population in the Western Hemisphere, yet it has not executed anyone since 2006.

The center calculated that about 1,388 people would remain under death sentence nationwide if the California changes are completed, the lowest national total since 1984. It also said California has spent an estimated $6 billion on capital punishment since reinstating it in 1978 while carrying out only 13 executions.

Its review found that two-thirds of California’s condemned prisoners were sentenced more than 20 years ago, while 70 percent were still waiting for counsel to handle their death-sentence appeals because of shortages in qualified attorneys and funding.

Newsom placed a moratorium on executions soon after taking office in 2019. He later dismantled the execution chamber at San Quentin and moved condemned prisoners into other maximum-security facilities.

This week’s announcement turns that temporary barrier into something far more durable for the current population.

But it does not repeal the death penalty.

California voters kept capital punishment in place in 2012 and again in 2016. Future juries can still impose death sentences unless voters change the law or the courts strike it down.

That distinction is why the move is both enormous and incomplete.

It permanently changes the punishment facing hundreds of convicted killers, but it leaves the underlying statute on the books.

ADVERTISEMENT

The reaction was immediate—and deeply divided.

CalMatters reported that victims’ advocates accused Newsom of overriding sentences handed down by juries and upheld by judges. Prosecutors argued that a blanket commutation treats hundreds of radically different crimes as though they were one case.

The California District Attorneys Association said the decision disregarded the anguish of families whose loved ones were murdered.

Former prosecutor Anne Marie Schubert pledged a court challenge and said families were not notified before the commutation plan was announced. Crime Victims United president Topo Padilla argued that one governor’s personal opposition should not erase decisions made by juries and approved by judges.

Newsom answered that selecting only some cases for mercy would create two classes of murder victims. His letter said the prisoners will die in prison, but not by the state’s hand—a formulation designed to pair permanent punishment with his rejection of execution.

Supporters answered that the death penalty has consumed billions of dollars, produced years of litigation and carried an unacceptable risk of wrongful conviction.

Eight men have been exonerated from California’s death row, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.

Some victims’ relatives also backed the move.

Kerry Kennedy, whose father Robert F. Kennedy was murdered in California, publicly thanked Newsom and called the commutations courageous.

Other families described the decision as a fresh betrayal.

That collision—between mercy, punishment, government power and the rights of victims—is exactly why this will not remain a California-only story.

The Los Angeles Times noted that Newsom waited until after the midterm election to announce the move. It also comes as he nears the end of his governorship and weighs a possible presidential campaign in 2028, giving supporters and opponents a ready-made test of how his California record might play with a national electorate.

The decision therefore lands as both a criminal-justice milestone and an unmistakable national political marker that Newsom’s rivals will revisit long after he leaves office.

Among Democratic primary voters, the decision could establish him as the politician willing to carry the anti-death-penalty argument farther than almost any governor before him.

In a general election, it could become a brutal attack line.

The Times reported that Newsom deliberately waited until after Tuesday’s midterm election to begin the mass-commutation process. The timing kept the issue out of the final campaign stretch while placing it squarely in the opening phase of the next presidential cycle.

The paper also emphasized what Newsom did not do: he did not ask voters to repeal capital punishment. California law still permits new death sentences, even as the governor uses clemency to erase the punishment from every current case he can reach.

That unresolved contradiction guarantees the fight will continue after Newsom leaves Sacramento.

Newsom knew that when he acted.

He did it anyway.

Now California’s highest court will decide how much of his historic move becomes final—and the rest of the country will decide what it says about the man who made it.

This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

 

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.