SPOILERS:

(If you want to watch the episode first, better do it now before you continue.)

Well, it’s over.

At least, that’s the impression they wanted to give as The Simpsons aired the first episode of season 36 last Sunday.

It’s an episode that starts with Conan O’Brien hosting an event, saying farewell to the show after it’s long run that started in 1989.

He then brings out an AI device that will craft the final episode and air it ‘live’.

Here’s where we should pay attention.

ADVERTISEMENT

It deals with Bart Simpson having a birthday and turning 11.

Trouble is, he’s always been 10 for these last 35 or so years.

Bart then notices that everything is changing.

And AI notices that Bart is becoming self aware and can’t control the episode any more.

Everything is shutting down and closing.

And everyone is saying “I’m sure going to miss this place” as they proceed to turn off the lights and leave whatever room/building they are in.

Everyone is happy.

Characters are arching.

People are finally getting their dreams and wishes.

Even Homer declares he’s going to be better father.

Refusing to blow the candles on his 11th birthday cake because then things won’t go back to the way they were.

ADVERTISEMENT

He wants to stay in the comfortable world he knows.

What kind of world is that?

“No one is happy in Springfield!”

That pretty much gives it away.

He then starts insulting Homer until he gets the expected response of “Why you little!“, and then gets the classic choking.

But this isn’t what the AI wrote.

So the episode glitches.

AI then declares it didn’t end.

It simple RESET…

There are some that are saying, like Ariel on Twitter, (I’ll post his tweet below) that this episode means that people are worried that “AI could manipulate our experiences..”

And that “At the end of the episode, Bart snaps out of the AI illusion, which saw him turning 11 despite being 10 since the show’s start. Once Bart is sentient again, the faux “series finale” comes to an end.”

ADVERTISEMENT

But I believe the AI bit in this show is a distraction.

The key phrase that I mentioned earlier is that “no one is happy”.

Doesn’t that sound like the world we currently live in?

How many happy people do you know?

How many happily married couples do you know that are thriving?

What’s the many reason people are leaving their marriage?

“I’m not happy!” And we have an epidemic of divorce going on that isn’t really talked about.

So why would we think that “Bart” represents us, the character that wants things to stay unhappy?

Bart seems to represent those running the System. The “star of the show”.

ADVERTISEMENT

He was the original star of the show, after all.

Also, Bart’s world is unnatural. He wants to stay 10 years old forever.

Isn’t our current culture very unnatural as well? Our government can’t even tell what a woman is.

They’re losing control and they see the world they live in, ‘Springfield’ changing all around them, despite what they do.

There’s a shift in things right now. Big changes happening all over and behind the scenes.

Our freedom is returning and happiness will again be the norm.

But there are those that don’t want this to occur.

They want a RESET.

And they want you to relate to Bart. To think that their reset is a good thing.

“The old way was better, wasn’t it? C’mon, stay with us.”

It isn’t.

This episode is like a twisted tale from the Twilight Zone, only the twist is on the watcher and they don’t realize it.

Also, it’s important to note that there are 2 resets.

One the Establishment is planning.

One that God is planning.

Which one do you think will win?

Sorry, Bart. We’re not going back to ‘unhappy & unnatural Springfield’. We’ve collected more than enough scars from that place.

People all over social media are asking the same thing, is there a hidden messages in it?

The Simpsons have a long history of ‘predicting’ future events.

USA Today reports:

Is it the end of the road for “The Simpsons”?

Not quite: The hit animated series aired its “final episode” on Sunday night, but in actuality, it was a meta-way to start the Season 36 premiere.

Titled “Bart’s Birthday” and presented as a “Fox special presentation,” the episode kicked off with animated celebrities shown rolling into the “Dolby-Mucinex Theater” for the occasion, hosted by Conan O’Brien.

By the end of the episode, Bart becomes self-aware and realizes his birthday means he will turn 11. (Bart has been 10 years old since the series began.) He refuses, leading to Homer strangling him and the show glitching and resetting. With everything then back to normal, the “series finale” is no longer.

New York Post adds:

The show’s AI storyline left fans perplexed but they eventually realized the show wasn’t actually ending.

Groening (Creator), 70, addressed the possible end to the series in a 2021 interview with USA Today.

“My standard answer is there’s no end in sight because anytime I speculate on the show ending, the people who work on it and diehard fans get very upset,” he said. “So, I always say there’s no end in sight.”

Season 37 of “The Simpsons” has yet to be announced.

Curious that this show is even still on.

Many viewers have left as it got steadily more woke over the past few years.

Here’s a graph showing the viewership for the show since season 12 (from fall of 2000) to now:

It’s been pointed out that Groening is a high level member of the Freemasons, and therefore has access to what the Establishment are planning.

This would explain how they’re able to accurately “predict” future events.

Remember the episode that mentions the earthquake machine?

So, are you ready for the coming reset?

RELATED REPORT:

The Simpsons Did It Again? Predicted President Kamala Harris?

The Simpsons Did It Again? Predicted President Kamala Harris?

How in the world does The Simpsons keep predicting the future?

Often times DECADES in advance?

I've covered this before but here's the latest twist...

Not only did The Simpsons seemingly predict a President Kamala Harris from Season 11 back in 2000 (24 years ago!) but the clip of a purple-suited woman serving as President has Lisa referencing how she took over for "President Trump".

Just another wacky coincidence?

Watch here:

The Simpsons has done it again! Here's from the 17th episode of the 11th season (in the year 2000) showing Lisa Simpson as the first female president of the United States talking about how the country is broke after President Trump. And, here's Kamala wearing the same outfit at Biden's inauguaration.

Now, let's examine if the clip is real....or was it faked.

Grok says it's real:

And ChatGPT says it's real.

So the clip is not altered.

How in the world did The Simpsons predict Trump and Kamala over 24 years ago?

And that tells you what happens next....we DO get a President Kamala Harris.

I just don't think it will be as a result of the election.

I think it will be as a result of Joe Biden dying or being removed from office in the next few days.

We will watch and see!

RELATED:

Simpsons Predicted Trump 2016...and Trump 2024?

One of the strangest things in pop culture is how often the Simpsons has seemingly predicted real life events....years or even decades before they happen.

So much so that a running joke is that show creator Matt Groening is a time traveler.

I took to ChatGPT to explain that common refrain:

The idea that Matt Groening, the creator of "The Simpsons," is a time traveler is a popular and humorous internet theory, but it is not based on reality. This theory has gained traction due to the show's numerous instances of seemingly predicting future events. Some of the notable predictions include Donald Trump's presidency, smartwatches, and the 2014 FIFA World Cup final.

However, these "predictions" are more likely coincidences or the result of the show's writers having a keen sense of social and technological trends. "The Simpsons" has been on the air since 1989 and has produced a vast number of episodes, which increases the likelihood of some plot elements accidentally resembling future events.

The time traveler theory is a fun and engaging way for fans to discuss the show's impact and its uncanny ability to touch on themes and ideas that later become relevant. But, scientifically and realistically speaking, there is no evidence to suggest that Matt Groening possesses any time-traveling capabilities.

So why do people even joke about him being a time traveler?

Because the show has predicted very strange things....over and over and over.

Let me give you some examples....all of these come from a great article over at The Collider:

One of the most shocking Simpsons predictions yet, "The Wizard of Evergreen Terrace" shows Homer's attempts at becoming an influential inventor like Thomas Edison. In a small part of the episode, Homer's seemingly nonsensical writing on a chalkboard reveals itself to be a complex math equation.

Renowned British science writer Simon Singh told The Independent that Homer's final figure on the chalkboard isn't too far from the 2012 CERN Higgs boson discovery. "If you work it out, you get the mass of a Higgs boson that's only a bit larger than the nano-mass of [what] a Higgs boson actually is," Singh said. "It's kind of amazing as Homer makes this prediction 14 years before it was discovered."

"Treehouse of Horror XIX" seems to have predicted an electoral mishap related to former President Barack Obama. A brief moment depicts Homer voting for Obama in a booth, but his soon revealed to have been tallied as one for John McCain.

A similar event would occur in 2012, with a viral YouTube video showing an incorrectly registered vote. Instead of the vote in a booth in Pennsylvania being counter for Obama, it appears to have been tallied for Mitt Romney, sparking controversy among the public.

One of The Simpsons' Superbowl episodes included a prediction of a musical artist's performance. In the 2012 episode "Lisa Goes Gaga," Lady Gaga visits Springfield and performs her songs while flying over an audience, and at one point, played the piano during her concert.

In 2017, Gaga performed at the Superbowl LI Halftime Show performing her greatest hits including "Poker Face," and "Bad Romance." During her halftime show performance, Gaga was lifted above the audience, mirroring the Simpsons episode. Later in the show, she also played "Million Reasons," on the piano.

There's a bunch more (20) that you can see over on The Collider.

And now we get to The Simpsons predicting a Trump Presidency, right down to exactly capturing the famous escalator ride in 2015.

But when was the Simpsons prediction made?

The year 2000....fifteen years earlier!

The episode "Bart to the Future" premiered in 2000, where Bart Simpson saw his and his sister's future. The leader of the country was Lisa Simpson, Lisa mentioned that the United States was tasked with fixing the economy after former Donald Trump's presidency.

Not only was Trump elected President in 2016, but one scene from the show looked as if it was almost replicated in real life. In the same episode, a crowd of people watched as Donald Trump descended an escalator – it's a scene that's now among The Simpsons predictions that came true. In reality, President Trump also descended the escalator with First Lady Melania Trump while a group of supporters watched in the background.

Even CNN has covered it and been astonished by the eerie prediction:

But it actually goes deeper than that....

Not only did The Simpsons predict Trump 2016, but they also specifically predicted Trump 2020, 2024 and even 2028.

Take a look -- this clip below cuts off at 2024 but I will show you a longer cut that shows 2028:

Here is the longer clip that shows 2028 included:

So....what do you think?

How is this possible?

Oh, and speaking of predicting the future, have you seen this?

The Economist Predicted EVERYTHING....In 2013?

Ready to go down the rabbit hole?

I'm going to give you photographic proof that is going to blow your mind, and what you do with that is then up to you.

I'm just your humble correspondent!

Let's talk about The Economist magazine, specifically how they strangely keep predicting the future years and decades in advance!

Before I show you those details, let's first talk about who OWNS the Economist magazine, because once you know that fact everything else suddenly makes a lot more sense.

So, who owns the Economist?

All the "Elite" power families that run the world.

No, seriously....almost all of them.

I already knew the answer, but I asked ChatGPT so I could show it to you.

Take a look:

The Economist magazine is owned by The Economist Group. The largest shareholders in The Economist Group are Exor, an investment company controlled by the Agnelli family of Italy, which holds about 43% of the shares, and the Cadbury, Rothschild, Schroder, and Layton families, which collectively own about 21%. The remaining shares are held by a group of independent shareholders, including current and former employees of the magazine.

The power players pulling the strings of the puppets on the world stage.

So when they own and publish a magazine, they tend to leak some secrets from time to time.

Actually, leak may not be the right word.

I've covered this many times before, but there seems to be some law of the Universe where these Evil Elites seem obligated to tell of the evil they are doing in advance.

I don't understand it, I don't know why, but before every big evil event, you can always find these people telling you it was coming in advance.

They often use Hollywood to do it.

We've seen countless examples of movies released years and decades in advance that have plots that tell the exact same story of real world events that would not happen for years or decades later.

We've seen it with The Simpsons and The X Files.

Too many times to count, but here are just a few:

  1. "The Lone Gunmen" TV Series (2001) - This show, a spin-off of "The X-Files," featured a pilot episode where the plot involved a government conspiracy to crash a commercial airliner into the World Trade Center to increase arms sales. This episode aired just months before the tragic events of September 11, 2001.
  2. "The Siege" (1998) - This film depicted terrorist attacks in New York City, including a bombing of a bus, and the subsequent military occupation of the city in response to the attacks. The themes of terrorism and the response to it in New York City eerily prefigured the events of 9/11.
  3. "Network" (1976) - This satirical film about a fictional television network predicted several future trends in the world of media, including the blurring of the line between news and entertainment and the rise of outrage as a media strategy, which has become increasingly relevant in the age of social media and 24-hour news cycles.
  4. "Wag the Dog" (1997) - This film, about a political spin doctor and a Hollywood producer who fabricate a war to distract from a presidential scandal, prefigured the way media and public relations tactics are used in politics, especially in the context of the Lewinsky scandal and the subsequent military actions in the Balkans under President Clinton.
  5. "Contagion" (2011) - This film's depiction of a global pandemic, originating from bats, and the challenges faced by public health officials, eerily mirrors the COVID-19 pandemic that began in 2019. The movie accurately predicted various aspects of pandemic response, including social distancing, the race for a vaccine, and conspiracy theories about the virus's origin.
  6. "Enemy of the State" (1998) - This movie's portrayal of widespread government surveillance, including the ability to track individuals through electronic devices, prefigured the real-life revelations about government surveillance programs like those uncovered by Edward Snowden in 2013.

And when they don't use Hollywood, they LOVE to use their precious Economist magazine.

But don't take my word for it, let me show you!

This is The Economist Magazine from December 2012 / January 2013 issue:

Here's a zoom in so you can see the details better:

Ok, so we have charming caption " A Rough Guide To Hell"....how nice.

But when you start studying the details that's where it starts to blow your mind.

Starting at the very top, where you have Netanyahu fighting Hamas....on paragliders!

Oh, you mean the EXACT same thing that would happen 10 years after this cover was published, when Hamas (allegedly) used paragliders to fly into Israel in a surprise attack?

Just an incredibly odd coincidence, huh?

A lot of those keep popping up....

What else do you see?  Drop a comment below, there is a ton hidden in here!  Let's see what everyone can find!

Then you have the literal devil running the Climate Change hoax, so I guess they got that one right.

And you have Obama in his pedo pride boat....

Interesting.

Like this you mean?

https://twitter.com/honkmediatv/status/1610999098659966977

A lot more here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gwPf8K3_Ms

But it's far from the first time The Economist has accurately predicted the future....

This may be the most famous one:

This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.
 

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.