Yesterday, I brought you this absolutely sickening report about a mother who ALLEGEDLY strangled her three young children, ALLEGEDLY confessed to it, and now for some reason a GoFundMe has been started to raise money for her parents?

That report was here if you missed it:

SICKENING: $715,000 Raised In GoFundMe For Family Of Woman Who (ALLEGEDLY) Strangled Her Three Children To Death

/*! This file is auto-generated */!function(d,l){“use strict”;l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&”undefined”!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll(‘iframe[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),o=l.querySelectorAll(‘blockquote[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),c=new RegExp(“^https?:$”,”i”),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);//# sourceURL=https://wltreport.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js

And now I have an update for you.

If you thought $715,000 was bonkers, it’s now over $850,000 and growing fast.

ADVERTISEMENT

Take a look:

I suppose it would be one thing if the idea was that her parents had nothing to do with this and they’re just as distraught as anyone else, so this is to help them out.  Maybe, I guess I could maybe understand that.

But that’s not really what’s going on.

What’s happening instead are people like this lady who flat out believes the mom didn’t do it:

The TikTok lady who started the GoFundMe for Lindsey Clancy’s parents does not believe Lindsey killed her kids. Admits to putting on a “tin foil hat” when sharing her beliefs.

The GoFundMe has (at this moment) reached over $850,000.

Although, I’m sure Lindsey’s parents have endured financial strain (along with extreme emotional anguish), the fact that this is campaigned by a woman who doesn’t even believe Lindsey’s own admissions regarding killing her children doesn’t sit well.

On top of this…

There seems to be huge irony in people dismissing LC’s words while also saying that she was failed because everyone else didn’t listen to her words.

I’m listening to the discourse regarding whether psychosis played a role, and I think those conversations are fair to examine, but the ‘tin foil hat’ theories are beyond reckless.

But she’s not alone.

I could post dozens if not hundreds of these.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here’s another:

I am going to lose followers for this but I don’t care.

48 hours ago, I believed Lindsay Clancy killed her children. Then I started actually watching the trial.

Now I have serious doubt and the defense hasn’t even begun.

By every account, Lindsay adored her children. Even her anxiety centered around protecting them and fear of leaving them. She was struggling and asking for help, yet Patrick fired the nanny, Patrick told his parents not to come help just two days before the deaths, and he continued traveling while she deteriorated.

Then there are the questions I cannot ignore:

The computer searches people assumed were Lindsay’s were Patrick’s. Medications Lindsay had turned over to Patrick to dispose of were later found in her system. Her writings included fears of someone else harming her children. First responders testified about finding Patrick sitting on the couch despite three dying children. And now questions surrounding another woman, trips, hotels and the timeline of that relationship deserve serious scrutiny.

Patrick is also the source of some of the most incriminating statements attributed to Lindsay. Not medical professionals or family members. It was Patrick who said she had thoughts of harming her children and who said that she killed her children. Meanwhile, first responders stated she wasn’t even able to speak because of her severe injuries, including her body temperature of 82 degrees.

I could go on and on and on about the various discrepancies coming out in court.

None of this proves what happened that night. That’s precisely my point.

ADVERTISEMENT

Why wasn’t every possibility thoroughly investigated? Why wasn’t Patrick investigated? Lindsay was charged just 21 hours after first responders got to her home and the case was closed.

This isn’t about defending Lindsay or accusing Patrick. It’s about three murdered children who deserve the truth.

I don’t know for certain what happened but neither does anyone else on the internet.

And after watching the Commonwealth’s own case, I don’t understand how anyone can claim there are no questions left to ask.

The defense hasn’t even begun.

I want to make abundantly clear, even CNN is admitting she killed the children — not even qualifying it with an “allegedly” — because she admitted it:

Lindsay Clancy was “calm and cooperative” during a psychiatric examination days after killing her three children and attempting suicide, a psychiatrist testified at her murder trial Monday.

Dr. Sejal Shah testified she examined Clancy multiple times at Boston’s Brigham and Women’s Hospital in January and February 2023.

In a January 30, 2023 assessment, Clancy denied having suicidal or homicidal intentions, denied having hallucinations or delusions that day, and her thought-process was “organized” and “goal-directed,” Shah said. In another assessment in February, Clancy was focused on her legal and physical situation and was looking forward to her rehab, Shah said.

ADVERTISEMENT

On cross-examination, Shah agreed Clancy was an “honest” patient. She acknowledged a person can communicate and make plans while still being in a state of psychosis.

The medical testimony came during the second week of Clancy’s trial on three counts of murder in the killings of her children Cora, 5; Dawson, 3; and 8-month-old Callan. The case has explored the controversial “insanity defense” and the severity of postpartum mental illness.

Shah was one of several medical professionals who testified Monday about Clancy’s mental condition and physical injuries. Other doctors testified about the fatal injuries to the children, and detectives told the court about Clancy’s diary entries describing her struggles.

On January 24, 2023, Clancy fatally strangled her three children in the basement of their Duxbury, Massachusetts, home using exercise resistance bands. She then cut her wrists and neck and jumped from a second-story window in a suicide attempt, leaving her partially paralyzed.

Prosecutors argued in opening statements she “deliberately and meticulously” killed her children and “acted intentionally, rationally, and swiftly to accomplish a very specific goal.”

Clancy’s defense has admitted to the killings but said she was suffering from postpartum psychosis and was not “criminally responsible.”

So what’s going on here?

Look, I have no idea what’s going on inside her head.

I have no doubt the heavy drugs she was allegedly on did not help anything and probably caused it.

But that’s the least interesting part of the story to me.

I care far less about her mind being warped by heavy psych drugs or by post-partum depression, I care much more about the thousands of women springing to her defense.

Like this one, look at this…someone literally donated $10,000!

I’ll tell you what, I’m not speaking about anyone in particular, but do you know the vibe this is giving me?

The vibe this is giving me overall is a Molochian vibe that a certain portion of our society simply thinks it’s ok to kill children.

In the womb, out of the womb, before birth, after birth….I really don’t think it matters to some people.

It started with abortion, and that was always couched as “women’s rights”.

But now it feels to me like it’s expanding.

Because I can’t quite fathom how anyone could come to this woman’s defense and donate her family money — hundreds of thousands of dollars — after what she allegedly admitted to doing.

Think I’m stretching it?

Then you clearly don’t remember this clip from former Governor Ralph Northam explaining live on TV how if a baby is somehow born alive after an abortion, they will “keep it comfortable” until they can kill it.

No joke, see the clip below:

FACT-CHECKING ABC NEWS: President Trump Was RIGHT About “Post-Birth Abortion”

/*! This file is auto-generated */!function(d,l){“use strict”;l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&”undefined”!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll(‘iframe[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),o=l.querySelectorAll(‘blockquote[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),c=new RegExp(“^https?:$”,”i”),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);//# sourceURL=https://wltreport.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js

ABC News tried to “Fact Check” President Trump last night in the debate, claiming that no state allows for “post-birth abortions.”

So I guess we have to Fact-Check the Fact-Checkers….

Folks, President Trump was not wrong, there is video evidence of it, and I’ve got it for you right here.

Trump was 100% right.

And we have the receipts!

Is it “legal” by state law?

No.

But is it happening?

Yes.

Just listen to former Governor Ralph Northam, who tells you point blank how they do it….

Here is a direct quote from Gov. Northam explaining how he would allow a baby to be born, he would “keep it comfortable” and then a decision would be made on what to do with the baby:

if a mother is in labor I can tell you
exactly what would happen the infant
would be delivered —  the infant would be
kept comfortable the infant would be
resuscitated if that’s what the mother
and the family desired and then a
discussion would ensue between the
physicians and the mother so so I think
this was really blown out of proportion

Ahhh yeah, even Democrats objected to that because, ummmm, that’s not even “abortion” that’s straight up murder of a living human being.

Watch here:

Backup here if needed:

Translation: 5 minutes or even 1 minute before a happy, healthy, human being baby would be born, he supports killing it in the womb.

Sick.

Evil.

Demonic.

I think the Bible is clear that life begins at conception, but there is at least some understandable discussion people can debate about very early on in the process.  Maybe.  I guess?

But full term?

One minute before birth?

That’s just straight up murder.

What are your thoughts?

NATIONAL POLL: Do You Still Support President Trump? vote now

TAP HERE TO ADD YOUR VOTE

This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

 

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.