A Biden-appointed federal judge erupted at Justice Department lawyers Monday and temporarily stopped work at the East Potomac Golf Links after hundreds of trees were cut down over the holiday weekend.

The courtroom clash was dramatic. But the government’s explanation for the work is a part of this story that most early coverage barely touched.

The National Park Service says the tree removal is meant to restore the century-old course’s historic links-style character—not secretly bulldoze a public park for President Trump.

U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes ordered the Interior Department to halt further work until at least Tuesday while she demanded answers about when federal officials knew the cutting would begin and why the court received notice at 4:55 p.m. Friday.

Congressional reporter Scott MacFarlane documented the judge’s sharp questioning from the hearing:

ADVERTISEMENT

The Washington Examiner reported that Reyes issued a minute order pausing additional tree removal before Monday’s hearing. The order barred the National Park Service from cutting more trees until Tuesday morning while the court examined what happened over the weekend.

The judge was nominated by Joe Biden and confirmed to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in 2023. Her order came in the continuing lawsuit brought by preservationists who are trying to stop President Trump’s proposed renovation of the public course.

The dispute centers on how much work was done, how quickly it happened and whether the administration gave the court meaningful advance notice.

A government lawyer said approximately 430 trees had already been cut. The National Park Service previously identified as many as 529 trees for removal across the broader rehabilitation plan.

Fox News Politics summarized the confrontation and the administration’s reliance on the 2019 Park Service restoration plan:

That looks startling—and it is exactly why the legal challenge moved so quickly.

Yet the government’s own court filing lays out a much more specific case than the phrase “Trump golf-course makeover” suggests.

In an October 9 sworn declaration filed in federal court, National Mall and Memorial Parks Superintendent Kevin Griess said East Potomac was designed as a traditional links-style course with open fairways, broad sightlines and relatively few interior trees. He said later plantings and unmanaged growth changed that historic design and blocked intended views.

Griess told the court that temporary staffing and additional resources allowed the agency to accelerate a long-delayed maintenance backlog. He said the work would remove non-contributing and invasive vegetation while preserving historic features, including healthy cherry trees.

ADVERTISEMENT

The declaration also drew a line between the tree-management work and any future redesign of the golf course. It said the project would not change individual holes, routing, greens, bunkers or landforms.

The agency’s public East Potomac rehabilitation plan gives the same rationale. NPS says the course was originally meant to resemble a Scottish links landscape, with open views toward the Potomac River, Washington Channel, Washington Monument, Jefferson Memorial and Capitol.

According to the plan, the targeted trees were evaluated as non-contributing to that historic landscape or incompatible with its intended character. The agency says the work is designed to reopen views, improve turf conditions and preserve strategically important specimen trees.

That does not settle the notice question. It does, however, matter when deciding whether the administration was carrying out a documented preservation plan or simply hacking away at a public course without any historical basis.

The plaintiffs argue that the cutting was irreversible and moved much faster than they were led to expect. Attorney Norm Eisen announced the emergency pause after preservation groups went back to court:

Reyes said Monday’s short-term halt could be extended while the court hears from additional Interior Department officials. A follow-up hearing was set for Tuesday.

President Trump has publicly supported turning East Potomac into a championship-level course, and that larger ambition is fueling suspicion around every chainsaw on the property.

Still, the record now presents two separate questions.

First: Did federal officials give the judge and the plaintiffs fair, timely notice before a major and irreversible operation?

ADVERTISEMENT

Second: Was the work itself legitimate historic-landscape restoration backed by years of Park Service planning?

The judge was plainly furious about the first. The administration’s documents provide a serious answer on the second.

That is the real fight now heading into Tuesday’s hearing—and the court should resolve it from the record, not from political outrage over President Trump improving a golf course.

This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

 

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.