A newly resurfaced report is making an extraordinary allegation about the CIA, consumer DNA databases and the search for bloodlines that may not be entirely human.

The claim is not that intelligence officials are merely studying family trees.

It is that the agency allegedly has a backdoor into services such as 23andMe and Ancestry — and is using it to hunt for a rare genetic marker tied to so-called “Nordic” extraterrestrials.

That is a blockbuster accusation. It is also unproven.

The report now drawing fresh attention was first published in May and was pushed back into the spotlight Sunday:

ADVERTISEMENT

The Daily Mail traces the allegation to Jason Reza Jorjani, an author with a doctorate in philosophy who said he heard it from former Army sergeant Lyn Buchanan.

Buchanan was involved in the government’s real remote-viewing work — an intelligence experiment that attempted to use alleged psychic perception to obtain information about distant people, places and events.

According to Jorjani’s account, Buchanan told him that former CIA scientist Christopher “Kit” Green was connected to a program capable of searching consumer genetic-testing databases for a variance outside normal human ancestry.

The genetic marker was supposedly associated with the “Nordics,” a purported alien race described in UFO lore as unusually tall, fair-skinned and Scandinavian in appearance.

Jorjani went further. He claimed Buchanan once encountered three such beings at a diner in the Colorado Rockies and was told that their descendants were living quietly in American communities after generations of intermarriage with humans.

In that telling, the alleged hybrids may not even know their own origins.

The report says the supposed visitors feared the CIA was trying to identify and track those bloodlines through the enormous databases built by popular ancestry services.

That is the allegation. The evidence offered publicly does not establish that it is true.

No program documents, search records, technical evidence or confirmed insiders were produced to demonstrate that the CIA has covert access to either company’s customer DNA.

ADVERTISEMENT

The report also notes a major chronological problem: Green left the CIA in the 1980s, years before either 23andMe or Ancestry’s consumer DNA business existed.

Still, the story was strange enough to draw a reaction from Rep. Eric Burlison, who has become one of the lawmakers most engaged with UAP claims on Capitol Hill:

The part of the story that is beyond dispute is the government’s history of experimenting with remote viewing.

The CIA openly acknowledges that intelligence agencies spent years studying whether people could obtain information through alleged psychic perception. Its own history dates the agency’s first in-house research to 1972, when scientists tested whether certain people could describe distant places and objects without physically being there.

The CIA ended its research in 1977 and transferred the program to the Defense Intelligence Agency, where the effort carried names including STARGATE and GRILL FLAME. When the work returned to the CIA in the mid-1990s, the agency required an independent evaluation before deciding whether it should continue.

That review found enough accurate results to rise above pure randomness, according to the CIA, but also concluded that remote viewing was too inconsistent and unreliable to produce useful intelligence. The program was not restored.

Congress later requested a review, and records gathered from the CIA, DIA and Army were declassified for the public reading room.

That documented history explains why Buchanan’s background attracts attention. It does not prove his alleged account about alien descendants or DNA-database access.

The companies’ published policies also push directly against the idea of casual government access.

ADVERTISEMENT

23andMe says it closely scrutinizes government demands and will comply only with court orders, subpoenas, search warrants or other requests it determines are legally valid. The company directs law-enforcement agencies to a formal guide before they seek customer records and says a valid legal process is required before it will even consider producing information.

Its current public guidance goes further: 23andMe says it has not released any customer information to law enforcement to date. The company also points customers to a transparency report intended to show how legal demands are handled.

None of that settles what a covert intelligence operation might attempt, but the policy describes a documented process built around specific legal requests — not blanket, searchable access to millions of genetic profiles.

Ancestry says it does not voluntarily cooperate with law enforcement and does not allow police to use its services to investigate crimes or identify human remains. Its guide draws clear lines between different kinds of records: basic subscriber information requires a valid subpoena; additional account or transactional information requires a court order; and DNA data or the contents of communications require a valid search warrant from an agency with proper jurisdiction.

Ancestry says its team reviews legal demands, tries to narrow requests it considers overly broad and generally notifies a user before disclosure unless the law forbids it.

A preservation request can hold a temporary snapshot of relevant records for 90 days, but the company says preservation does not itself authorize disclosure. Those rules describe targeted legal process, not the sweeping access alleged in the report.

The broader privacy issue is real even without the alien claim.

Millions of Americans have voluntarily sent deeply personal genetic material to private companies in exchange for ancestry estimates, family matches and health information. That data cannot be changed like a password if it is exposed, mishandled or obtained by a government.

Americans deserve strong safeguards, transparent legal standards and honest answers about who can reach those databases.

ADVERTISEMENT

UAP transparency has also become a serious political question rather than a fringe punchline. Earlier this year, Rep. Tim Burchett described asking President Trump to release what the government has seen in classified briefings:

That push for disclosure should mean more evidence, not lower standards.

If the government has concealed programs involving nonhuman intelligence, Americans should be shown the records. If intelligence agencies can secretly search commercial DNA databases, Congress should expose the mechanism and shut down any unlawful access.

But an astonishing allegation does not become a fact because it fits an already mysterious history.

For now, there are three separate realities: the remote-viewing program existed, consumer DNA privacy is a legitimate national concern, and the alleged hunt for “alien” bloodlines remains unsupported by public proof.

That distinction is not a reason to stop asking questions.

It is the reason to demand answers that can survive daylight.

Featured image: CIA headquarters at Langley. Official CIA.gov photograph; U.S. government work.

This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

 

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.