The Trump administration is preparing a visa crackdown on a scale the United States has never seen before.
Up to 200,000 foreigners who entered on business or tourist visas and later sought asylum could soon have those visas revoked.
The move would target people who told the government they were coming temporarily, then filed claims seeking permission to remain in the country.
And if the reported plan moves forward, it would be the largest single mass visa revocation in American history.
The news broke Monday afternoon:
🚨 BREAKING: The Trump admin is set to imminently revoke 200,000 tourism and business visas, forcing them to go back to their home countries
The VAST majority of these visa holders are FAKE asylum seekers
This is the largest visa revocation in HISTORY. LFG! 🔥 pic.twitter.com/TBQh2HD7Wh
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) August 24, 2026
According to The Associated Press, State Department documents and two U.S. officials describe a plan covering B1 and B2 visas issued from 2016 through 2026.
Those are nonimmigrant visas intended for temporary business trips, tourism and similar short visits—not permanent settlement in the United States.
The reported review focuses on holders who later applied for asylum or whose asylum cases are still pending. The State Department is expected to make an announcement in the coming weeks unless the plan is revised or blocked.
State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott confirmed that his department is coordinating with the Department of Homeland Security to identify foreigners who entered as short-term visitors and then filed asylum claims to remain permanently.
Pigott did not confirm a final total. He said the number remains dynamic because the revocations would be carried out on a rolling basis.
That is an important distinction: the documents point to a ceiling of roughly 200,000 cases, while the final number could be lower.
The official White House Rapid Response 47 account amplified the report shortly after it appeared:
US set for largest mass visa revocation in history targeting up to 200,000 foreigners, officials sayhttps://t.co/FhS9RyJZRp
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) August 24, 2026
For President Trump, this is about closing a glaring loophole in the immigration system.
A B1 or B2 visa is issued after an applicant represents that the trip will be temporary. An asylum application, by contrast, asks the United States for protection based on a claimed fear of persecution and can become a path toward remaining indefinitely.
Those two positions can collide.
If a traveler secured entry by promising a temporary visit but intended from the beginning to stay through an asylum claim, the administration argues that the original basis for issuing the visa was false.
Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau made that argument directly Monday, saying asylum should be a narrow refuge for people facing persecution—not a back door around ordinary immigration law:
People in the US and all over the world are fed up with bogus asylum claims. Asylum isn’t supposed to be a loophole to circumvent immigration laws; rather, it’s supposed to provide a narrow safe harbor for persons persecuted because of their “race, religion, nationality,… pic.twitter.com/fNHbj1SsIX
— Christopher Landau (@DeputySecState) August 24, 2026
The plan also fits a much broader push under Secretary of State Marco Rubio to treat a U.S. visa as a privilege that remains subject to continuous review.
Reuters independently reported the proposed sweep Monday and placed it inside President Trump’s larger immigration-enforcement campaign.
The administration has increased scrutiny of visa applicants, expanded social-media screening, required bonds in selected cases and imposed new restrictions on nationals from countries identified as security or public-safety risks.
This proposed action is different because of its sheer size. Instead of reviewing a few hundred politically sensitive or criminal cases, the State Department would examine an enormous class of visitor visas tied to later asylum filings.
Legal challenges are almost certain. Immigration attorneys will argue that applying for asylum is lawful and that filing a claim does not, by itself, prove a person lied when obtaining a visitor visa.
The administration’s answer will be that consular officials have broad authority over visas and that the government does not have to preserve a temporary travel document after the holder declares an intention to remain.
One more point matters: revoking a visa is not automatically the same as issuing an immediate deportation order.
AP reported that many people with pending asylum cases would be reclassified and lose their business-or-tourist visa status, but the revocation alone would not necessarily end the underlying asylum case or produce instant removal.
That means DHS, immigration courts and any coming lawsuits could determine how quickly individual cases move from visa revocation to actual departure.
But the political message could not be clearer.
The era of using a temporary visitor visa as a one-way ticket into the American asylum backlog may be coming to an end.
President Trump campaigned on restoring consequences to an immigration system overwhelmed by years of weak enforcement and enormous case backlogs.
Now his administration is preparing to test one of the most aggressive tools available: cancel the visitor visas, identify the cases and force the system to confront who came temporarily—and who intended to stay all along.
Send them home!
This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.
What are your thoughts?
