President Trump’s new rancher orders have been widely described as allowing producers to bypass the largest meatpackers and sell directly to consumers.

The policy direction is real, but the legal change is more measured than some of the shorthand suggests. The orders tell federal agencies to widen existing routes for eligible meat products, strengthen competition enforcement and identify barriers that still require regulatory or congressional action.

They do not immediately create a blanket exemption from meat inspection, food-safety laws, state rules or local health requirements.

The central document is the executive order on livestock-market competition and processor access. It says ranchers should have more opportunities to process, package and sell meat across state lines while maintaining food-safety standards.

President Trump directed the Agriculture Department to expand investigations into possible Packers and Stockyards Act violations, add enforcement resources and coordinate with the Justice Department on potential antitrust cases. USDA must report within 60 days on its current enforcement work, staffing needs and plan for the next year.

ADVERTISEMENT

The order also tells USDA to accelerate state participation in federal-state inspection programs, provide technical assistance to small processors and identify legal barriers that limit interstate sales. A separate 60-day report must explain which restrictions come from federal statutes and which can be addressed through agency action.

That means the administration is targeting the bottleneck between a rancher raising cattle and legally selling packaged meat in a broader market. A producer may own the animal and arrange processing today, but commercial sales remain governed by the inspection status of the facility and the rules attached to the product.

The current USDA state-inspection system covers roughly 1,450 meat and poultry establishments in 29 states. USDA describes all of those plants as small or very small, and state programs must enforce requirements at least equal to federal standards.

Without an approved interstate pathway, products from a state-inspected facility generally remain limited to sales inside that state. The Cooperative Interstate Shipment program allows qualifying state-inspected plants to ship across state lines under federal oversight, while federally inspected plants already have interstate access.

USDA says it pays up to half of state program operating costs and provides training and other assistance. The new order seeks to increase participation in those cooperative routes, simplify the process and modernize inspections, but it repeatedly limits agency action to what is permitted under existing law.

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins presented the two orders as part of a broader administration effort on behalf of producers.

The competition piece matters because the White House says the four largest beef packers account for about 85% of steer and heifer purchases. The order does not break up those companies or declare that any one of them violated the law.

Instead, it directs USDA to look more aggressively for unfair, deceptive or price-manipulating practices and to refer appropriate cases to the Justice Department. Any enforcement case would still require evidence and would proceed under the Packers and Stockyards Act or federal antitrust law.

The order also calls for a new guaranteed-loan program for small and regional processors. That could help existing plants continue operating or expand capacity, but the order does not specify a funding total or announce immediate loans to individual businesses.

ADVERTISEMENT

A companion executive order supporting ranchers adds a separate 90-day review of federal regulations and policies. It directs Agriculture, Interior, the U.S. Trade Representative, the FDA and the Small Business Administration to recommend steps aimed at improving rancher finances and market access.

That second order also requires a review of whether gray wolves and Mexican wolves meet federal recovery criteria for delisting or downlisting. It directs agencies to examine livestock-loss compensation and emergency predator-removal standards, but it does not immediately delist either species.

USDA and the trade representative must also examine whether existing law permits mandatory country-of-origin labeling for beef and analyze the economic effects. Depending on that review, the administration may pursue regulations or ask Congress for legislation.

The practical effect is a series of deadlines, not an overnight deregulation of meat sales. USDA now has 60 days to map enforcement and interstate-processing barriers, while the broader rancher review runs on a 90-day clock.

Those reports should clarify how far the administration can go on its own and where Congress would need to change the law. Until then, ranchers and processors still operate under the inspection and food-safety requirements already in force.

This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

What are your thoughts?

READER POLL: Do You Still TRUST President Trump? vote now

TAP HERE TO ADD YOUR VOTE

 

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.