A 2-year-old boy named Barrett Walsh is dead, and the allegations surrounding his final hours are almost impossible to comprehend.

His mother, Corie Walsh, now faces three counts of first-degree murder in Frankfort, Illinois.

Prosecutors say she had also become deeply absorbed in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial and was discussing that case with friends only hours before Barrett was found.

Frankfort Local summarized the police announcement saying officers were dispatched to the 22700 block of Brook Stone Court at about 4:04 p.m. on September 1 after a report of an unresponsive child.

A neighbor was already trying to save Barrett when officers arrived. The boy was taken to a hospital, where he was pronounced dead.

ADVERTISEMENT

Three other children connected to the home were physically unharmed. Police said Walsh was hospitalized with injuries that were not life-threatening before being placed in custody.

The Will County Coroner’s Office conducted an autopsy the following day. Frankfort police and the Will-Grundy Major Crimes Task Force continued the investigation while the department asked the community to respect the family’s privacy.

Those facts describe a devastating loss. The court filing adds details that make the case even more disturbing.

FOX 32 Chicago reported from the court proffer that the neighbor found Barrett suspended from a device attached to a basement rafter. The neighbor removed the ligature, lowered him and performed CPR while calling 911.

Preliminary autopsy findings listed asphyxia caused by ligature compression of the neck, according to prosecutors. The police department said the final cause and manner of death remained pending as the investigation continued.

Walsh was found upstairs in a bathtub with injuries to her wrists and thighs, the filing says. A knife was recovered and placed into evidence.

Prosecutors allege Walsh told officers that she killed Barrett because she believed he was the “devil” and the “anti-Christ.” They say she later described what happened in statements that matched evidence recovered inside the home.

The three murder counts do not represent three victims. They present different legal theories for one alleged killing: intent to kill, knowledge that the act would cause death and knowledge that it created a strong probability of death.

Every charge remains an allegation unless proven in court. Prosecutors have asked a judge to keep Walsh detained before trial.

ADVERTISEMENT

The filing also draws a direct timeline between this case and another child-killing prosecution that had captured national attention.

Witnesses told investigators that Walsh had become “very invested” in the Lindsay Clancy trial in Massachusetts. Clancy was prosecuted after killing her three children, while her defense argued that she was not criminally responsible because of postpartum psychosis.

Walsh was allegedly discussing the Clancy case in a group text at about 12:30 p.m. on September 1. That was roughly three and a half hours before Barrett was discovered.

Investigators are now conducting a forensic examination of Walsh’s phone. What those messages show about her state of mind, planning or motive will be for the court to determine.

Following or discussing another murder trial does not establish that it caused a later crime.

The alleged timing still makes the messages important evidence. Prosecutors are certain to scrutinize every one.

Walsh’s attorney, Andrea Lyon, said the family is mourning Barrett and described the death as a tragedy for everyone involved. She also said Walsh was experiencing a psychotic episode at the time.

That statement is the defense’s position. It is not yet a judicial finding or a publicly established medical diagnosis.

Mental illness can be real and severe without settling the separate legal question of criminal responsibility. That decision must be based on evidence, expert testimony and Illinois law, not assumptions borrowed from the Clancy case.

ADVERTISEMENT

Nor should the battle over Walsh’s mental state push Barrett out of his own story.

He was two years old. He depended completely on the adults around him for protection.

A teenager who entered the home reportedly tried to save him under conditions no child should ever have to face. Three other children were left to live with the aftermath.

The courtroom will sort through the charges, the phone evidence and the defense’s claim. Barrett deserves a process that tells the truth about what happened and places accountability where the evidence proves it belongs.

Until then, the presumption of innocence applies to Walsh. The urgency of justice belongs to Barrett.

If you or someone you know is in emotional distress or a suicidal crisis, call or text 988 to reach the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline.

 

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.